Claude Sonnet 5 0243b6ec4c retro: push mechanical coding-standards findings toward deterministic checks ...

retro currently treats every reviewer-agent gap the same way: write a new
CODING_STANDARDS.md line. That's fine for judgement calls, but for fixed
syntactic patterns it just asks the reviewer agent to re-derive the same
call on every future diff, forever, instead of paying once for a check.

Adds two things to the Automated checks / Coding standards categories:
- Automated checks now treats an un-linted repo (no pre-commit hook, no CI
  job running lint/typecheck/test) as a finding in its own right, not just
  a consequence of a specific mistake.
- Coding standards now classifies a violation as mechanical (deterministic
  check) vs. judgement call (CODING_STANDARDS.md) before writing a finding,
  and defaults to building the check.

Kept language-agnostic (no ESLint/ts-specific naming) since retro runs
across repos in different languages. No em-dashes, per this repo's prose
rule in CLAUDE.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-09-15 10:37:13 +00:00

..

deprecated

Remove all em-dashes from the repo

2026-08-19 10:03:37 +00:00

engineering

fix: quote SKILL.md descriptions with unquoted colons

2026-08-19 13:01:26 +00:00

in-progress

retro: push mechanical coding-standards findings toward deterministic checks

2026-09-15 10:37:13 +00:00

misc

Remove all em-dashes from the repo

2026-08-19 10:03:37 +00:00

productivity

grilling: separate questions in a round with an HR

2026-08-20 10:34:29 +00:00