skills/docs/productivity/writing-for-agents.md

Quickstart:

npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill=writing-for-agents

npx skills update writing-for-agents

Source

What it does

writing-for-agents is the reference you write agent-facing documents against — skills, AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md, and any doc an agent reaches by a pointer. The packaging differs; the writing does not: the same levers make each one predictable, so the agent takes the same process every run rather than producing the same output.

Formerly writing-great-skills. The rename tracks what the reference always was underneath: almost none of it is skill-specific. The universal core — context pointers, the two loads, the information hierarchy, completion criteria, leading words, pruning — applies to any document an agent consumes; the genuinely skill-only mechanics (frontmatter, the model- vs user-invoked choice, router skills) are disclosed to a linked SKILL-MECHANICS.md you read only when the document you're writing is a skill.

When to reach for it

The agent reaches for it on its own whenever you're creating or editing a skill, or modifying AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md — and you can still type /writing-for-agents to pull it up directly.

The two loads

The concept the whole reference turns on is a pair of budgets every document and pointer spends:

• Context load — the cost of always-loaded material on the agent's window: an AGENTS.md line, a skill description, anything sitting in context every turn whether or not it fires.
• Cognitive load — the cost on the human: which documents exist and when to reach for each. You are the index. Not a cost to minimise — it's the price of human agency.

Once you're thinking in these two loads, most authoring decisions — split or don't, inline or disclose, point or push — become the same trade made in different places.

The other levers

• Context pointers — the reference held in context that names out-of-context material and encodes when to reach it. A skill description and an AGENTS.md line pointing at a doc are the same object; the pointer's wording, not its target, decides when and how reliably the agent reaches through it.
• Information hierarchy — the ladder from in-file step, to in-file reference, to disclosed reference behind a pointer. Progressive disclosure is the move down that ladder so the top stays legible; co-location decides what sits beside each piece once placed.
• Completion criteria — the clarity and demand of each step's done-condition, and the legwork it drives; the defence against premature completion.
• Leading words — a compact concept already in the model's pretraining (tight, red, tracer bullet) that the agent thinks with while running the document; hunt restatements a single word can retire.
• Pruning — single source of truth, relevance, and the no-op test applied sentence by sentence, against sediment and sprawl.

Where it fits

This is a reach-for-it-anytime standalone reference — the meta-skill you consult while building the rest of the set, not a step in a chain. When you're unsure which skill or flow fits a task, ask-matt routes you over the whole set.