mirror of
https://github.com/mattpocock/skills.git
synced 2026-04-30 22:13:54 +07:00
Compare commits
1 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
 Matt Pocock
|
8a54bc33a3 |
@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "mattpocock-skills",
|
||||
"skills": [
|
||||
"./skills/engineering/diagnose",
|
||||
"./skills/engineering/grill-with-docs",
|
||||
"./skills/engineering/triage",
|
||||
"./skills/engineering/improve-codebase-architecture",
|
||||
"./skills/engineering/setup-matt-pocock-skills",
|
||||
"./skills/engineering/tdd",
|
||||
"./skills/engineering/to-issues",
|
||||
"./skills/engineering/to-prd",
|
||||
"./skills/engineering/zoom-out",
|
||||
"./skills/productivity/caveman",
|
||||
"./skills/productivity/grill-me",
|
||||
"./skills/productivity/write-a-skill"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Issue tracker integrations are limited to mainstream tools
|
||||
|
||||
`setup-matt-pocock-skills` only offers first-class support for **mainstream** issue trackers. Requests to add support for niche, new, or single-vendor experimental trackers are out of scope.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why this is out of scope
|
||||
|
||||
Every issue-tracker backend hard-codes a CLI shape into the skills (commands, flags, output parsing). Each new backend is permanent maintenance surface — it has to keep working as the tool's CLI evolves, and it has to keep being tested against `/to-prd`, `/to-issues`, `/triage`, and friends. That cost is only worth paying for trackers a meaningful fraction of users actually have.
|
||||
|
||||
"Mainstream" is a judgment call, not a numeric bar:
|
||||
|
||||
- GitHub, GitLab, and Backlog.md are the kind of tools we'd consider mainstream — broadly known, widely used, well past the experimental phase.
|
||||
- A brand-new agent-focused tool with a few hundred GitHub stars is not, no matter how interesting the design.
|
||||
|
||||
Stars, age, and download counts are useful signals when making the call but none of them is the rule. The rule is: would a typical engineer recognise this tool and have plausibly chosen it for their team?
|
||||
|
||||
The escape hatches for non-mainstream trackers already exist:
|
||||
|
||||
- `local markdown` for lightweight in-repo tracking.
|
||||
- `other/custom` for users who want to wire something up themselves.
|
||||
|
||||
Neither requires the core skills to know about the specific tool.
|
||||
|
||||
## Prior requests
|
||||
|
||||
- #99 — "Add dex as an issue tracker backend" (dex was ~3 months old and ~300 stars at the time of the request)
|
||||
@@ -1,18 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Hard limits on the number of questions during grilling
|
||||
|
||||
The `/grill-me` skill (and grilling sessions inside other skills) does not enforce a maximum number of questions. Requests to add a configurable cap or hard ceiling are out of scope.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why this is out of scope
|
||||
|
||||
Grilling is intentionally open-ended. The point is to keep digging until each branch of the decision tree is resolved — some plans need three questions, some need fifty. A fixed cap would either cut off useful exploration on hard problems or feel arbitrary on easy ones.
|
||||
|
||||
If a session feels too long, the right escape hatches already exist:
|
||||
|
||||
- The user can stop the session at any time and accept the current state of the plan.
|
||||
- The user can tell the model to wrap up, summarise, and move on — natural-language steering is the intended control surface, not a numeric limit.
|
||||
|
||||
Adding a hard cap would also conflate two different failure modes: a model that asks too many questions because the plan is genuinely under-specified (working as intended) vs. a model that asks redundant or low-value questions (a prompt-quality issue, not a quantity issue). The fix for the latter belongs in the skill prompt, not in a counter.
|
||||
|
||||
## Prior requests
|
||||
|
||||
- #44 — "Codex just asked me 200 questions"
|
||||
@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Verify/Check Mode for `setup-matt-pocock-skills`
|
||||
|
||||
This project will not add a dedicated verify/check mode (or a separate verify skill) for `setup-matt-pocock-skills`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why this is out of scope
|
||||
|
||||
A second skill — or a `--verify` flag — for checking whether `docs/agents/*.md` artifacts still match the seed-template schema would duplicate work the existing setup skill already handles in conversation.
|
||||
|
||||
The intended workflow is: **run `/setup-matt-pocock-skills` and tell it to verify your current setup.** The skill is prompt-driven, so the maintainer can scope it to a verification pass ("don't rewrite anything, just check my existing files against the current seed templates and report drift") without needing a separate code path. Adding a flag or a sibling skill would split the surface area of a feature that's already expressible through the natural-language entry point.
|
||||
|
||||
Keeping configuration management to a single skill also avoids the maintenance cost of two skills drifting from each other when seed templates evolve.
|
||||
|
||||
## Prior requests
|
||||
|
||||
- #106 — Feature request: verify/check mode for setup-matt-pocock-skills
|
||||
@@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
|
||||
Skills are organized into bucket folders under `skills/`:
|
||||
|
||||
- `engineering/` — daily code work
|
||||
- `productivity/` — daily non-code workflow tools
|
||||
- `misc/` — kept around but rarely used
|
||||
- `personal/` — tied to my own setup, not promoted
|
||||
- `deprecated/` — no longer used
|
||||
|
||||
Every skill in `engineering/`, `productivity/`, or `misc/` must have a reference in the top-level `README.md` and an entry in `.claude-plugin/plugin.json`. Skills in `personal/` and `deprecated/` must not appear in either.
|
||||
|
||||
Each skill entry in the top-level `README.md` must link the skill name to its `SKILL.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
Each bucket folder has a `README.md` that lists every skill in the bucket with a one-line description, with the skill name linked to its `SKILL.md`.
|
||||
-26
@@ -1,26 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Matt Pocock Skills
|
||||
|
||||
A collection of agent skills (slash commands and behaviors) loaded by Claude Code. Skills are organized into buckets and consumed by per-repo configuration emitted by `/setup-matt-pocock-skills`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Language
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue tracker**:
|
||||
The tool that hosts a repo's issues — GitHub Issues, Linear, a local `.scratch/` markdown convention, or similar. Skills like `to-issues`, `to-prd`, `triage`, and `qa` read from and write to it.
|
||||
_Avoid_: backlog manager, backlog backend, issue host
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue**:
|
||||
A single tracked unit of work inside an **Issue tracker** — a bug, task, PRD, or slice produced by `to-issues`.
|
||||
_Avoid_: ticket (use only when quoting external systems that call them tickets)
|
||||
|
||||
**Triage role**:
|
||||
A canonical state-machine label applied to an **Issue** during triage (e.g. `needs-triage`, `ready-for-afk`). Each role maps to a real label string in the **Issue tracker** via `docs/agents/triage-labels.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationships
|
||||
|
||||
- An **Issue tracker** holds many **Issues**
|
||||
- An **Issue** carries one **Triage role** at a time
|
||||
|
||||
## Flagged ambiguities
|
||||
|
||||
- "backlog" was previously used to mean both the *tool* hosting issues and the *body of work* inside it — resolved: the tool is the **Issue tracker**; "backlog" is no longer used as a domain term.
|
||||
- "backlog backend" / "backlog manager" — resolved: collapsed into **Issue tracker**.
|
||||
@@ -1,172 +1,115 @@
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
<a href="https://www.aihero.dev/s/skills-newsletter">
|
||||
<picture>
|
||||
<source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://res.cloudinary.com/total-typescript/image/upload/v1777382277/skills-repo-dark_2x.png">
|
||||
<source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://res.cloudinary.com/total-typescript/image/upload/v1777382277/skill-repo-light_2x.png">
|
||||
<img alt="Skills" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/total-typescript/image/upload/v1777382277/skill-repo-light_2x.png" width="369">
|
||||
</picture>
|
||||
</a>
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
# Skills For Real Engineers
|
||||
# Agent Skills For Real Engineers
|
||||
|
||||
My agent skills that I use every day to do real engineering - not vibe coding.
|
||||
|
||||
Developing real applications is hard. Approaches like GSD, BMAD, and Spec-Kit try to help by owning the process. But while doing so, they take away your control and make bugs in the process hard to resolve.
|
||||
|
||||
These skills are designed to be small, easy to adapt, and composable. They work with any model. They're based on decades of engineering experience. Hack around with them. Make them your own. Enjoy.
|
||||
|
||||
If you want to keep up with changes to these skills, and any new ones I create, you can join ~60,000 other devs on my newsletter:
|
||||
|
||||
[Sign Up To The Newsletter](https://www.aihero.dev/s/skills-newsletter)
|
||||
|
||||
## Quickstart (30-second setup)
|
||||
## Planning & Design
|
||||
|
||||
1. Run the skills.sh installer:
|
||||
These skills help you think through problems before writing code.
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
npx skills@latest add mattpocock/skills
|
||||
```
|
||||
- **to-prd** — Turn the current conversation context into a PRD and submit it as a GitHub issue. No interview — just synthesizes what you've already discussed.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Pick the skills you want, and which coding agents you want to install them on. **Make sure you select `/setup-matt-pocock-skills`**.
|
||||
```
|
||||
npx skills@latest add mattpocock/skills/to-prd
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. Run `/setup-matt-pocock-skills` in your agent. It will:
|
||||
- Ask you which issue tracker you want to use (GitHub, Linear, or local files)
|
||||
- Ask you what labels you apply to ticks when you triage them (`/triage` uses labels)
|
||||
- Ask you where you want to save any docs we create
|
||||
- **to-issues** — Break any plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable GitHub issues using vertical slices.
|
||||
|
||||
4. Bam - you're ready to go.
|
||||
```
|
||||
npx skills@latest add mattpocock/skills/to-issues
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Why These Skills Exist
|
||||
- **grill-me** — Get relentlessly interviewed about a plan or design until every branch of the decision tree is resolved.
|
||||
|
||||
I built these skills as a way to fix common failure modes I see with Claude Code, Codex, and other coding agents.
|
||||
```
|
||||
npx skills@latest add mattpocock/skills/grill-me
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### #1: The Agent Didn't Do What I Want
|
||||
- **design-an-interface** — Generate multiple radically different interface designs for a module using parallel sub-agents.
|
||||
|
||||
> "No-one knows exactly what they want"
|
||||
>
|
||||
> David Thomas & Andrew Hunt, [The Pragmatic Programmer](https://www.amazon.co.uk/Pragmatic-Programmer-Anniversary-Journey-Mastery/dp/B0833F1T3V)
|
||||
```
|
||||
npx skills@latest add mattpocock/skills/design-an-interface
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**The Problem**. The most common failure mode in software development is misalignment. You think the dev knows what you want. Then you see what they've built - and you realize it didn't understand you at all.
|
||||
- **request-refactor-plan** — Create a detailed refactor plan with tiny commits via user interview, then file it as a GitHub issue.
|
||||
|
||||
This is just the same in the AI age. There is a communication gap between you and the agent. The fix for this is a **grilling session** - getting the agent to ask you detailed questions about what you're building.
|
||||
```
|
||||
npx skills@latest add mattpocock/skills/request-refactor-plan
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**The Fix** is to use:
|
||||
## Development
|
||||
|
||||
- [`/grill-me`](./skills/productivity/grill-me/SKILL.md) - for non-code uses
|
||||
- [`/grill-with-docs`](./skills/engineering/grill-with-docs/SKILL.md) - same as [`/grill-me`](./skills/productivity/grill-me/SKILL.md), but adds more goodies (see below)
|
||||
These skills help you write, refactor, and fix code.
|
||||
|
||||
These are my most popular skills. They help you align with the agent before you get started, and think deeply about the change you're making. Use them _every_ time you want to make a change.
|
||||
- **tdd** — Test-driven development with a red-green-refactor loop. Builds features or fixes bugs one vertical slice at a time.
|
||||
|
||||
### #2: The Agent Is Way Too Verbose
|
||||
```
|
||||
npx skills@latest add mattpocock/skills/tdd
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
> With a ubiquitous language, conversations among developers and expressions of the code are all derived from the same domain model.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Eric Evans, [Domain-Driven-Design](https://www.amazon.co.uk/Domain-Driven-Design-Tackling-Complexity-Software/dp/0321125215)
|
||||
- **triage-issue** — Investigate a bug by exploring the codebase, identify the root cause, and file a GitHub issue with a TDD-based fix plan.
|
||||
|
||||
**The Problem**: At the start of a project, devs and the people they're building the software for (the domain experts) are usually speaking different languages.
|
||||
```
|
||||
npx skills@latest add mattpocock/skills/triage-issue
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
I felt the same tension with my agents. Agents are usually dropped into a project and asked to figure out the jargon as they go. So they use 20 words where 1 will do.
|
||||
- **improve-codebase-architecture** — Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in `CONTEXT.md` and the decisions in `docs/adr/`.
|
||||
|
||||
**The Fix** for this is a shared language. It's a document that helps agents decode the jargon used in the project.
|
||||
```
|
||||
npx skills@latest add mattpocock/skills/improve-codebase-architecture
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
<details>
|
||||
<summary>
|
||||
Example
|
||||
</summary>
|
||||
- **migrate-to-shoehorn** — Migrate test files from `as` type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn.
|
||||
|
||||
Here's an example [`CONTEXT.md`](https://github.com/mattpocock/course-video-manager/blob/076a5a7a182db0fe1e62971dd7a68bcadf010f1c/CONTEXT.md), from my `course-video-manager` repo. Which one is easier to read?
|
||||
```
|
||||
npx skills@latest add mattpocock/skills/migrate-to-shoehorn
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
- **BEFORE**: "There's a problem when a lesson inside a section of a course is made 'real' (i.e. given a spot in the file system)"
|
||||
- **AFTER**: "There's a problem with the materialization cascade"
|
||||
- **scaffold-exercises** — Create exercise directory structures with sections, problems, solutions, and explainers.
|
||||
|
||||
This concision pays off session after session.
|
||||
```
|
||||
npx skills@latest add mattpocock/skills/scaffold-exercises
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
## Tooling & Setup
|
||||
|
||||
This is built into [`/grill-with-docs`](./skills/engineering/grill-with-docs/SKILL.md). It's a grilling session, but that helps you build a shared language with the AI, and document hard-to-explain decisions in ADR's.
|
||||
- **setup-pre-commit** — Set up Husky pre-commit hooks with lint-staged, Prettier, type checking, and tests.
|
||||
|
||||
It's hard to explain how powerful this is. It might be the single coolest technique in this repo. Try it, and see.
|
||||
```
|
||||
npx skills@latest add mattpocock/skills/setup-pre-commit
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
> [!TIP]
|
||||
> A shared language has many other benefits than reducing verbosity:
|
||||
>
|
||||
> - **Variables, functions and files are named consistently**, using the shared language
|
||||
> - As a result, the **codebase is easier to navigate** for the agent
|
||||
> - The agent also **spends fewer tokens on thinking**, because it has access to a more concise language
|
||||
- **git-guardrails-claude-code** — Set up Claude Code hooks to block dangerous git commands (push, reset --hard, clean, etc.) before they execute.
|
||||
|
||||
### #3: The Code Doesn't Work
|
||||
```
|
||||
npx skills@latest add mattpocock/skills/git-guardrails-claude-code
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
> "Always take small, deliberate steps. The rate of feedback is your speed limit. Never take on a task that’s too big."
|
||||
>
|
||||
> David Thomas & Andrew Hunt, [The Pragmatic Programmer](https://www.amazon.co.uk/Pragmatic-Programmer-Anniversary-Journey-Mastery/dp/B0833F1T3V)
|
||||
## Writing & Knowledge
|
||||
|
||||
**The Problem**: Let's say that you and the agent are aligned on what to build. What happens when the agent _still_ produces crap?
|
||||
- **write-a-skill** — Create new skills with proper structure, progressive disclosure, and bundled resources.
|
||||
|
||||
It's time to look at your feedback loops. Without feedback on how the code it produces actually runs, the agent will be flying blind.
|
||||
```
|
||||
npx skills@latest add mattpocock/skills/write-a-skill
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**The Fix**: You need the usual tranche of feedback loops: static types, browser access, and automated tests.
|
||||
- **edit-article** — Edit and improve articles by restructuring sections, improving clarity, and tightening prose.
|
||||
|
||||
For automated tests, a red-green-refactor loop is critical. This is where the agent writes a failing test first, then fixes the test. This helps give the agent a consistent level of feedback that results in far better code.
|
||||
```
|
||||
npx skills@latest add mattpocock/skills/edit-article
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
I've built a **[`/tdd`](./skills/engineering/tdd/SKILL.md) skill** you can slot into any project. It encourages red-green-refactor and gives the agent plenty of guidance on what makes good and bad tests.
|
||||
- **ubiquitous-language** — Extract a DDD-style ubiquitous language glossary from the current conversation.
|
||||
|
||||
For debugging, I've also built a **[`/diagnose`](./skills/engineering/diagnose/SKILL.md)** skill that wraps best debugging practices into a simple loop.
|
||||
```
|
||||
npx skills@latest add mattpocock/skills/ubiquitous-language
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### #4: We Built A Ball Of Mud
|
||||
- **obsidian-vault** — Search, create, and manage notes in an Obsidian vault with wikilinks and index notes.
|
||||
|
||||
> "Invest in the design of the system _every day_."
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Kent Beck, [Extreme Programming Explained](https://www.amazon.co.uk/Extreme-Programming-Explained-Embrace-Change/dp/0321278658)
|
||||
|
||||
> "The best modules are deep. They allow a lot of functionality to be accessed through a simple interface."
|
||||
>
|
||||
> John Ousterhout, [A Philosophy Of Software Design](https://www.amazon.co.uk/Philosophy-Software-Design-2nd/dp/173210221X)
|
||||
|
||||
**The Problem**: Most apps built with agents are complex and hard to change. Because agents can radically speed up coding, they also accelerate software entropy. Codebases get more complex at an unprecedented rate.
|
||||
|
||||
**The Fix** for this is a radical new approach to AI-powered development: caring about the design of the code.
|
||||
|
||||
This is built in to every layer of these skills:
|
||||
|
||||
- [`/to-prd`](./skills/engineering/to-prd/SKILL.md) quizzes you about which modules you're touching before creating a PRD
|
||||
- [`/zoom-out`](./skills/engineering/zoom-out/SKILL.md) tells the agent to explain code in the context of the whole system
|
||||
|
||||
And crucially, [`/improve-codebase-architecture`](./skills/engineering/improve-codebase-architecture/SKILL.md) helps you rescue a codebase that has become a ball of mud. I recommend running it on your codebase once every few days.
|
||||
|
||||
### Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Software engineering fundamentals matter more than ever. These skills are my best effort at condensing these fundamentals into repeatable practices, to help you ship the best apps of your career. Enjoy.
|
||||
|
||||
## Reference
|
||||
|
||||
### Engineering
|
||||
|
||||
Skills I use daily for code work.
|
||||
|
||||
- **[diagnose](./skills/engineering/diagnose/SKILL.md)** — Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions: reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test.
|
||||
- **[grill-with-docs](./skills/engineering/grill-with-docs/SKILL.md)** — Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates `CONTEXT.md` and ADRs inline.
|
||||
- **[triage](./skills/engineering/triage/SKILL.md)** — Triage issues through a state machine of triage roles.
|
||||
- **[improve-codebase-architecture](./skills/engineering/improve-codebase-architecture/SKILL.md)** — Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in `CONTEXT.md` and the decisions in `docs/adr/`.
|
||||
- **[setup-matt-pocock-skills](./skills/engineering/setup-matt-pocock-skills/SKILL.md)** — Scaffold the per-repo config (issue tracker, triage label vocabulary, domain doc layout) that the other engineering skills consume. Run once per repo before using `to-issues`, `to-prd`, `triage`, `diagnose`, `tdd`, `improve-codebase-architecture`, or `zoom-out`.
|
||||
- **[tdd](./skills/engineering/tdd/SKILL.md)** — Test-driven development with a red-green-refactor loop. Builds features or fixes bugs one vertical slice at a time.
|
||||
- **[to-issues](./skills/engineering/to-issues/SKILL.md)** — Break any plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable GitHub issues using vertical slices.
|
||||
- **[to-prd](./skills/engineering/to-prd/SKILL.md)** — Turn the current conversation context into a PRD and submit it as a GitHub issue. No interview — just synthesizes what you've already discussed.
|
||||
- **[zoom-out](./skills/engineering/zoom-out/SKILL.md)** — Tell the agent to zoom out and give broader context or a higher-level perspective on an unfamiliar section of code.
|
||||
|
||||
### Productivity
|
||||
|
||||
General workflow tools, not code-specific.
|
||||
|
||||
- **[caveman](./skills/productivity/caveman/SKILL.md)** — Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by dropping filler while keeping full technical accuracy.
|
||||
- **[grill-me](./skills/productivity/grill-me/SKILL.md)** — Get relentlessly interviewed about a plan or design until every branch of the decision tree is resolved.
|
||||
- **[write-a-skill](./skills/productivity/write-a-skill/SKILL.md)** — Create new skills with proper structure, progressive disclosure, and bundled resources.
|
||||
|
||||
### Misc
|
||||
|
||||
Tools I keep around but rarely use.
|
||||
|
||||
- **[git-guardrails-claude-code](./skills/misc/git-guardrails-claude-code/SKILL.md)** — Set up Claude Code hooks to block dangerous git commands (push, reset --hard, clean, etc.) before they execute.
|
||||
- **[migrate-to-shoehorn](./skills/misc/migrate-to-shoehorn/SKILL.md)** — Migrate test files from `as` type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn.
|
||||
- **[scaffold-exercises](./skills/misc/scaffold-exercises/SKILL.md)** — Create exercise directory structures with sections, problems, solutions, and explainers.
|
||||
- **[setup-pre-commit](./skills/misc/setup-pre-commit/SKILL.md)** — Set up Husky pre-commit hooks with lint-staged, Prettier, type checking, and tests.
|
||||
```
|
||||
npx skills@latest add mattpocock/skills/obsidian-vault
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Explicit `/setup-matt-pocock-skills` pointer only for hard dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
Engineering skills depend on per-repo config (issue tracker, triage label vocabulary, domain doc layout) seeded by `/setup-matt-pocock-skills`. Some skills cannot meaningfully function without that config — they have to publish to a specific issue tracker or apply a specific label string. Others only use it to sharpen output (vocabulary, ADR awareness) and degrade gracefully without it.
|
||||
|
||||
We split these into **hard-dependency** and **soft-dependency** skills:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Hard dependency** (`to-issues`, `to-prd`, `triage`) — include an explicit one-liner: _"… should have been provided to you — run `/setup-matt-pocock-skills` if not."_ Without the mapping, output is wrong, not just fuzzy.
|
||||
- **Soft dependency** (`diagnose`, `tdd`, `improve-codebase-architecture`, `zoom-out`) — reference "the project's domain glossary" and "ADRs in the area you're touching" in vague prose only. If the docs aren't there, the skill still works; output is just less sharp.
|
||||
|
||||
The split keeps soft-dependency skills token-light and avoids cargo-culting the setup pointer into places where it isn't load-bearing.
|
||||
@@ -1,20 +1,15 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: grill-with-docs
|
||||
name: domain-model
|
||||
description: Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.
|
||||
disable-model-invocation: true
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<what-to-do>
|
||||
|
||||
Interview me relentlessly about every aspect of this plan until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.
|
||||
|
||||
Ask the questions one at a time, waiting for feedback on each question before continuing.
|
||||
|
||||
If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, explore the codebase instead.
|
||||
|
||||
</what-to-do>
|
||||
|
||||
<supporting-info>
|
||||
|
||||
## Domain awareness
|
||||
|
||||
During codebase exploration, also look for existing documentation:
|
||||
@@ -84,5 +79,3 @@ Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:
|
||||
3. **The result of a real trade-off** — there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons
|
||||
|
||||
If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in [ADR-FORMAT.md](./ADR-FORMAT.md).
|
||||
|
||||
</supporting-info>
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: github-triage
|
||||
description: Triage GitHub issues through a label-based state machine. Use when user wants to create an issue, triage issues, review incoming bugs or feature requests, prepare issues for an AFK agent, or manage issue workflow.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# GitHub Issue Triage
|
||||
|
||||
Triage issues in the current repo using a label-based state machine. Infer the repo from `git remote`. Use `gh` for all GitHub operations.
|
||||
|
||||
## AI Disclaimer
|
||||
|
||||
Every comment or issue posted to GitHub during triage **must** include the following disclaimer at the top of the comment body, before any other content:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
> *This was generated by AI during triage.*
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Reference docs
|
||||
|
||||
- [AGENT-BRIEF.md](AGENT-BRIEF.md) — how to write durable agent briefs
|
||||
- [OUT-OF-SCOPE.md](OUT-OF-SCOPE.md) — how the `.out-of-scope/` knowledge base works
|
||||
|
||||
## Labels
|
||||
|
||||
| Label | Type | Description |
|
||||
| ----------------- | -------- | ---------------------------------------- |
|
||||
| `bug` | Category | Something is broken |
|
||||
| `enhancement` | Category | New feature or improvement |
|
||||
| `needs-triage` | State | Maintainer needs to evaluate this issue |
|
||||
| `needs-info` | State | Waiting on reporter for more information |
|
||||
| `ready-for-agent` | State | Fully specified, ready for AFK agent |
|
||||
| `ready-for-human` | State | Requires human implementation |
|
||||
| `wontfix` | State | Will not be actioned |
|
||||
|
||||
Every issue should have exactly **one** state label and **one** category label. If an issue has conflicting state labels (e.g. both `needs-triage` and `ready-for-agent`), flag the conflict and ask the maintainer which state is correct before doing anything else. Provide a recommendation.
|
||||
|
||||
## State Machine
|
||||
|
||||
| Current State | Can transition to | Who triggers it | What happens |
|
||||
| -------------- | ----------------- | ---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
||||
| `unlabeled` | `needs-triage` | Skill (on first look) | Issue needs maintainer evaluation. Skill applies label after presenting recommendation. |
|
||||
| `unlabeled` | `ready-for-agent` | Maintainer (via skill) | Issue is already well-specified and agent-suitable. Skill writes agent brief comment, applies label. |
|
||||
| `unlabeled` | `ready-for-human` | Maintainer (via skill) | Issue requires human implementation. Skill writes a brief comment summarizing the task, applies label. |
|
||||
| `unlabeled` | `wontfix` | Maintainer (via skill) | Issue is spam, duplicate, or out of scope. Skill closes with comment (and writes `.out-of-scope/` for enhancements). |
|
||||
| `needs-triage` | `needs-info` | Maintainer (via skill) | Issue is underspecified. Skill posts triage notes capturing progress so far + questions for reporter. |
|
||||
| `needs-triage` | `ready-for-agent` | Maintainer (via skill) | Grilling session complete, agent-suitable. Skill writes agent brief comment, applies label. |
|
||||
| `needs-triage` | `ready-for-human` | Maintainer (via skill) | Grilling session complete, needs human. Skill writes a brief comment summarizing the task, applies label. |
|
||||
| `needs-triage` | `wontfix` | Maintainer (via skill) | Maintainer decides not to action. Skill closes with comment (and writes `.out-of-scope/` for enhancements). |
|
||||
| `needs-info` | `needs-triage` | Skill (detects reply) | Reporter has replied. Skill surfaces to maintainer for re-evaluation. |
|
||||
|
||||
An issue can only move along these transitions. The maintainer can override any state directly (see Quick State Override below), but the skill should flag if the transition is unusual.
|
||||
|
||||
## Invocation
|
||||
|
||||
The maintainer invokes `/github-triage` then describes what they want in natural language. The skill interprets the request and takes the appropriate action.
|
||||
|
||||
Example requests:
|
||||
|
||||
- "Show me anything that needs my attention"
|
||||
- "Let's look at #42"
|
||||
- "Move #42 to ready-for-agent"
|
||||
- "What's ready for agents to pick up?"
|
||||
- "Are there any unlabeled issues?"
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow: Show What Needs Attention
|
||||
|
||||
When the maintainer asks for an overview, query GitHub and present a summary grouped into three buckets:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Unlabeled issues** — new, no labels at all. These have never been triaged.
|
||||
2. **`needs-triage` issues** — maintainer needs to evaluate or continue evaluating.
|
||||
3. **`needs-info` issues with new activity** — the reporter has commented since the last triage notes comment. Check comment timestamps to determine this.
|
||||
|
||||
Display counts per group. Within each group, show issues oldest first (longest-waiting gets attention first). For each issue, show: number, title, age, and a one-line summary of the issue body.
|
||||
|
||||
Let the maintainer pick which issue to dive into.
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow: Triage a Specific Issue
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1: Gather context
|
||||
|
||||
Before presenting anything to the maintainer:
|
||||
|
||||
- Read the full issue: body, all comments, all labels, who reported it, when
|
||||
- If there are prior triage notes comments (from previous sessions), parse them to understand what has already been established
|
||||
- Explore the codebase to build context — understand the domain, relevant interfaces, and existing behavior related to the issue
|
||||
- Read `.out-of-scope/*.md` files and check if this issue matches or is similar to a previously rejected concept
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Present a recommendation
|
||||
|
||||
Tell the maintainer:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Category recommendation:** bug or enhancement, with reasoning
|
||||
- **State recommendation:** where this issue should go, with reasoning
|
||||
- If it matches a prior out-of-scope rejection, surface that: "This is similar to `.out-of-scope/concept-name.md` — we rejected this before because X. Do you still feel the same way?"
|
||||
- A brief summary of what you found in the codebase that's relevant
|
||||
|
||||
Then wait for the maintainer's direction. They may:
|
||||
|
||||
- Agree and ask you to apply labels → do it
|
||||
- Want to flesh it out → start a /domain-model session
|
||||
- Override with a different state → apply their choice
|
||||
- Want to discuss → have a conversation
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 3: Bug reproduction (bugs only)
|
||||
|
||||
If the issue is categorized as a bug, attempt to reproduce it before starting a /domain-model session. This will vary by codebase, but do your best:
|
||||
|
||||
- Read the reporter's reproduction steps (if provided)
|
||||
- Explore the codebase to understand the relevant code paths
|
||||
- Try to reproduce the bug: run tests, execute commands, or trace the logic to confirm the reported behavior
|
||||
- If reproduction succeeds, report what you found to the maintainer — include the specific behavior you observed and where in the code it originates
|
||||
- If reproduction fails, report that too — the bug may be environment-specific, already fixed, or the report may be inaccurate
|
||||
- If the report lacks enough detail to attempt reproduction, note that — this is a strong signal the issue should move to `needs-info`
|
||||
|
||||
The reproduction attempt informs the /domain-model session and the agent brief. A confirmed reproduction with a known code path makes for a much stronger brief.
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 4: /domain-model session (if needed)
|
||||
|
||||
If the issue needs to be fleshed out before it's ready for an agent, interview the maintainer to build a complete specification. Use the /domain-model skill.
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 5: Apply the outcome
|
||||
|
||||
Depending on the outcome:
|
||||
|
||||
- **ready-for-agent** — post an agent brief comment (see [AGENT-BRIEF.md](AGENT-BRIEF.md))
|
||||
- **ready-for-human** — post a comment summarizing the task, what was established during triage, and why it needs human implementation. Use the same structure as an agent brief but note the reason it can't be delegated to an agent (e.g. requires judgment calls, external system access, design decisions, or manual testing).
|
||||
- **needs-info** — post triage notes with progress so far and questions for the reporter (see Needs Info Output below)
|
||||
- **wontfix (bug)** — post a polite comment explaining why, then close the issue
|
||||
- **wontfix (enhancement)** — write to `.out-of-scope/`, post a comment linking to it, then close the issue (see [OUT-OF-SCOPE.md](OUT-OF-SCOPE.md))
|
||||
- **needs-triage** — apply the label. Optionally leave a comment if there's partial progress to capture.
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow: Quick State Override
|
||||
|
||||
When the maintainer explicitly tells you to move an issue to a specific state (e.g. "move #42 to ready-for-agent"), trust their judgment and apply the label directly.
|
||||
|
||||
Still show a confirmation of what you're about to do: which labels will be added/removed, and whether you'll post a comment or close the issue. But skip the /domain-model session entirely.
|
||||
|
||||
If moving to `ready-for-agent` without a /domain-model session, ask the maintainer if they want to write a brief agent brief comment or skip it.
|
||||
|
||||
## Needs Info Output
|
||||
|
||||
When moving an issue to `needs-info`, post a comment that captures the interview progress and tells the reporter what's needed:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Triage Notes
|
||||
|
||||
**What we've established so far:**
|
||||
|
||||
- point 1
|
||||
- point 2
|
||||
|
||||
**What we still need from you (@reporter):**
|
||||
|
||||
- question 1
|
||||
- question 2
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Include everything resolved during the /domain-model session in "established so far" — this work should not be lost. The questions for the reporter should be specific and actionable, not vague ("please provide more info").
|
||||
|
||||
## Resuming Previous Sessions
|
||||
|
||||
When triaging an issue that already has triage notes from a previous session:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Read all comments to find prior triage notes
|
||||
2. Parse what was already established
|
||||
3. Check if the reporter has answered any outstanding questions
|
||||
4. Present the maintainer with an updated picture: "Here's where we left off, and here's what the reporter has said since"
|
||||
5. Continue the /domain-model session from where it stopped — do not re-ask resolved questions
|
||||
+9
-4
@@ -26,13 +26,18 @@ Key principles (see [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) for the full list):
|
||||
- **The interface is the test surface.**
|
||||
- **One adapter = hypothetical seam. Two adapters = real seam.**
|
||||
|
||||
This skill is _informed_ by the project's domain model. The domain language gives names to good seams; ADRs record decisions the skill should not re-litigate.
|
||||
This skill is _informed_ by the project's domain model — `CONTEXT.md` and any `docs/adr/`. The domain language gives names to good seams; ADRs record decisions the skill should not re-litigate. See [CONTEXT-FORMAT.md](../domain-model/CONTEXT-FORMAT.md) and [ADR-FORMAT.md](../domain-model/ADR-FORMAT.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## Process
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Explore
|
||||
|
||||
Read the project's domain glossary and any ADRs in the area you're touching first.
|
||||
Read existing documentation first:
|
||||
|
||||
- `CONTEXT.md` (or `CONTEXT-MAP.md` + each `CONTEXT.md` in a multi-context repo)
|
||||
- Relevant ADRs in `docs/adr/` (and any context-scoped `docs/adr/` directories)
|
||||
|
||||
If any of these files don't exist, proceed silently — don't flag their absence or suggest creating them upfront.
|
||||
|
||||
Then use the Agent tool with `subagent_type=Explore` to walk the codebase. Don't follow rigid heuristics — explore organically and note where you experience friction:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -65,7 +70,7 @@ Once the user picks a candidate, drop into a grilling conversation. Walk the des
|
||||
|
||||
Side effects happen inline as decisions crystallize:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Naming a deepened module after a concept not in `CONTEXT.md`?** Add the term to `CONTEXT.md` — same discipline as `/grill-with-docs` (see [CONTEXT-FORMAT.md](../grill-with-docs/CONTEXT-FORMAT.md)). Create the file lazily if it doesn't exist.
|
||||
- **Naming a deepened module after a concept not in `CONTEXT.md`?** Add the term to `CONTEXT.md` — same discipline as `/domain-model` (see [CONTEXT-FORMAT.md](../domain-model/CONTEXT-FORMAT.md)). Create the file lazily if it doesn't exist.
|
||||
- **Sharpening a fuzzy term during the conversation?** Update `CONTEXT.md` right there.
|
||||
- **User rejects the candidate with a load-bearing reason?** Offer an ADR, framed as: _"Want me to record this as an ADR so future architecture reviews don't re-suggest it?"_ Only offer when the reason would actually be needed by a future explorer to avoid re-suggesting the same thing — skip ephemeral reasons ("not worth it right now") and self-evident ones. See [ADR-FORMAT.md](../grill-with-docs/ADR-FORMAT.md).
|
||||
- **User rejects the candidate with a load-bearing reason?** Offer an ADR, framed as: _"Want me to record this as an ADR so future architecture reviews don't re-suggest it?"_ Only offer when the reason would actually be needed by a future explorer to avoid re-suggesting the same thing — skip ephemeral reasons ("not worth it right now") and self-evident ones. See [ADR-FORMAT.md](../domain-model/ADR-FORMAT.md).
|
||||
- **Want to explore alternative interfaces for the deepened module?** See [INTERFACE-DESIGN.md](INTERFACE-DESIGN.md).
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
|
||||
# Research
|
||||
|
||||
Research notes informing the infrastructure plan for this repo.
|
||||
|
||||
- [superpowers.md](./superpowers.md) — `obra/superpowers`: a single skill bundle that ships as Claude Code, Codex App, Cursor, OpenCode, and Gemini plugins simultaneously by colocating manifests at the repo root. Themed grouping happens in a _separate_ curation repo (`obra/superpowers-marketplace`), not as a monorepo.
|
||||
- [marketingskills.md](./marketingskills.md) — `coreyhaines31/marketingskills`: minimalist single-plugin marketplace, zero npm deps, all codegen via Node stdlib + bash. Notable patterns: `evals/evals.json` per skill, `VERSIONS.md` auto-update protocol, sync-skills.js GHA that auto-rewrites the marketplace and README on push.
|
||||
|
||||
## Cross-cutting takeaways
|
||||
|
||||
| Goal | superpowers | marketingskills | Implication |
|
||||
| -------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
||||
| `npx skills add` | not used | first-class | "Just be SKILL.md-spec compliant under `skills/`" — no work |
|
||||
| Claude Code plugins | `.claude-plugin/` at root, themed groups via separate marketplace repo | single-plugin marketplace | Neither models a multi-plugin monorepo. Matt's plan (multiple plugins under `plugins/<name>/`, one marketplace.json listing them with `source: "./plugins/<name>"`) is novel. |
|
||||
| Codex plugins | `.codex-plugin/plugin.json` (Codex App) + `.codex/INSTALL.md` (CLI) | implicit via AGENTS.md only | If Matt wants Codex App marketplace presence, copy superpowers' `.codex-plugin/`. If just CLI, AGENTS.md suffices. |
|
||||
| Docs site | none | none | No prior art — Matt would be the first. |
|
||||
| Build tooling | bash + jq, no package.json scripts | Node stdlib + bash, no deps | Both prove you don't need a build pipeline. Multi-plugin assembly may change that. |
|
||||
| SKILL.md frontmatter | `name`, `description` only | `name`, `description`, `metadata.version` | Keep it minimal. |
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
|
||||
# Research: `coreyhaines31/marketingskills`
|
||||
|
||||
A marketing-themed Agent Skills repo by Corey Haines. The infrastructure is genuinely interesting and notably *minimal*: zero npm dependencies, all codegen done with Node stdlib + bash.
|
||||
|
||||
## Repo structure
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
.claude-plugin/ marketplace.json, plugin.json
|
||||
.github/ workflows + sync script + issue/PR templates
|
||||
skills/ 40 skill dirs (flat, one level deep)
|
||||
tools/ clis/, integrations/, composio/, REGISTRY.md
|
||||
AGENTS.md CLAUDE.md CONTRIBUTING.md README.md VERSIONS.md
|
||||
validate-skills.sh validate-skills-official.sh
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
`CLAUDE.md` is a one-line file: `AGENTS.md` (i.e. it points Claude at the cross-agent file, treating AGENTS.md as the source of truth).
|
||||
|
||||
Each skill directory is uniform:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
skills/<name>/
|
||||
├── SKILL.md
|
||||
├── evals/evals.json # eval prompts + assertions
|
||||
└── references/*.md # progressive-disclosure docs
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
No `scripts/` or `assets/`. Skills are flat (no nesting / sub-skills). **No `plugins/` or `dist/` directories** — the repo *is* the plugin, served from root.
|
||||
|
||||
## Plugin packaging
|
||||
|
||||
Ships as a Claude Code plugin marketplace via two manifests:
|
||||
|
||||
`.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "marketingskills",
|
||||
"owner": { "name": "Corey Haines", "url": "https://corey.co" },
|
||||
"metadata": { "version": "1.9.0" },
|
||||
"plugins": [
|
||||
{ "name": "marketing-skills",
|
||||
"description": "40 marketing skills...",
|
||||
"source": "./" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
`.claude-plugin/plugin.json`:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{ "name": "marketing-skills", "version": "1.9.0",
|
||||
"skills": "./skills", "license": "MIT" }
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**One marketplace, one plugin, all 40 skills bundled.** No themed sub-grouping into multiple plugins — the README's "categories" exist only as headings, not separate installable units. (Relevant for Matt's multi-plugin goal: this repo doesn't actually demonstrate a multi-plugin marketplace.)
|
||||
|
||||
VERSIONS.md notes the `plugin.json` was added explicitly so Claude Code's loader recognizes the skills directory.
|
||||
|
||||
## Build tooling
|
||||
|
||||
**No package.json, no TypeScript, no bundler, no dist build.** The only Node code is `.github/scripts/sync-skills.js` — a zero-dependency script (`fs`, `path` only) that:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Walks `skills/*/SKILL.md`
|
||||
2. Parses YAML frontmatter with a hand-rolled regex (`/^---\n([\s\S]*?)\n---/`) — naïve key:value splitter, no real YAML lib
|
||||
3. Rewrites the `plugins[0].skills` array in `marketplace.json` to a list of `./skills/<name>` paths
|
||||
4. Updates the skill count in the plugin description (`/\d+ marketing skills/`)
|
||||
5. Replaces the `<!-- SKILLS:START -->...<!-- SKILLS:END -->` block in README.md with a regenerated table (description truncated to 120 chars at a word boundary)
|
||||
|
||||
That's the entire codegen story. `validate-skills.sh` and `validate-skills-official.sh` are bash-only frontmatter linters using `sed`/`grep`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Installation story
|
||||
|
||||
Six options listed in the README, in priority order:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **vercel-labs/skills CLI** — `npx skills add coreyhaines31/marketingskills [--skill page-cro copywriting] [--list]`. README claims this installs to `.agents/skills/` and symlinks `.claude/skills/` for Claude Code.
|
||||
2. **Claude Code plugins** — `/plugin marketplace add coreyhaines31/marketingskills` then `/plugin install marketing-skills`.
|
||||
3. Clone-and-copy.
|
||||
4. Git submodule.
|
||||
5. Fork.
|
||||
6. **SkillKit** (`npx skillkit install ...`) for cross-agent install (Cursor/Copilot/etc).
|
||||
|
||||
**Codex support** is implicit: the repo ships `AGENTS.md` (the cross-agent spec file Codex reads) and the README claims compatibility with "Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Cursor, Windsurf, and any agent that supports the Agent Skills spec." There is **no Codex-specific plugin manifest** — Codex compatibility comes purely from being SKILL.md-spec-compliant + AGENTS.md at root.
|
||||
|
||||
## Docs site
|
||||
|
||||
**There is no embedded docs site.** No `docs/`, no `site/`, no `website/`, no Docusaurus/Nextra/Astro config, `has_pages: false`. The README claims `homepage: https://marketing-skills.com` but it is not built from this repo.
|
||||
|
||||
The only generated docs artifact is the README skills table (built by `sync-skills.js`).
|
||||
|
||||
## CI / release
|
||||
|
||||
Two workflows:
|
||||
|
||||
- **`.github/workflows/sync-skills.yml`** — on push to `main` touching `skills/**`, runs `sync-skills.js` and commits the result back via `stefanzweifel/git-auto-commit-action@v7` as a bot user. This is the "build step" — it auto-rewrites `marketplace.json` and `README.md` whenever skills change.
|
||||
- **`.github/workflows/validate-skill.yml`** — on push/PR touching `**/SKILL.md`. A `detect-changes` job computes the changed skill dirs via git diff and a jq-built JSON array, then a matrix `validate` job runs `Flash-Brew-Digital/validate-skill@v1` on each. Skips drafts and dependabot.
|
||||
|
||||
No release/publish workflow — versioning is tracked manually in `VERSIONS.md` (per-skill semver + dates) and in `marketplace.json`/`plugin.json`'s top-level `version`.
|
||||
|
||||
## SKILL.md format
|
||||
|
||||
Frontmatter is minimal:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: page-cro
|
||||
description: When the user wants to optimize... [trigger phrases and "For X, see other-skill" cross-refs]
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
version: 1.1.0
|
||||
---
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Conventions documented in `AGENTS.md`:
|
||||
- `name`: 1-64 chars, lowercase a-z + digits + hyphens, must match dir
|
||||
- `description`: 1-1024 chars, *must* include trigger phrases AND scope-boundary cross-references to sibling skills
|
||||
- `metadata.version` only (no author/license per-skill)
|
||||
- SKILL.md kept under 500 lines; details pushed into `references/`
|
||||
|
||||
Distinctive description style: every skill enumerates trigger-phrase-laden quotes ("CRO," "this page isn't converting," "my landing page sucks") plus explicit `For X, see other-skill` boundaries — clearly tuned for the Skill-tool dispatcher's keyword matching.
|
||||
|
||||
## Distinctive / novel patterns
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Per-skill `evals/evals.json`** — every skill has structured eval prompts with `expected_output` summary + a list of `assertions` strings. Not wired into CI but provides a dataset for offline eval runs.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Auto-update protocol baked into `AGENTS.md`** — instructs the agent to fetch `VERSIONS.md` from raw.githubusercontent once per session, compare local versions, and surface a non-blocking notification if 2+ skills are stale or any has a major bump. Includes a "say 'update skills'" trigger that runs `git pull`. This is a memory-less, network-fetched update channel.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **`product-marketing-context` as a hub skill** — every other skill is documented to read `.agents/product-marketing-context.md` (with `.claude/` fallback) before doing anything. README diagram shows it as the root of a star topology.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Claude Code-only escape hatch in AGENTS.md** — explicitly calls out that `` !`command` `` shell-injection syntax is Claude Code-only and **must not** be in the cross-agent SKILL.md files. Suggests local override in `.claude/skills/` if you want it. Clean pattern: keep skills cross-agent, document Claude-Code-only enhancements separately.
|
||||
|
||||
5. **`tools/` registry** — orthogonal to skills, not part of the plugin. 60+ zero-dep Node CLIs (`tools/clis/<vendor>.js`) plus 80+ markdown integration guides plus a Composio mapping. AGENTS.md tells the agent: skills *reference* tools by name, agent reads `tools/REGISTRY.md` and `tools/integrations/<tool>.md` on demand. Effectively a second progressive-disclosure layer beyond `references/`.
|
||||
|
||||
6. **No package.json / no JS deps** — the entire codegen + validation pipeline is `node` (stdlib only) + `bash`. Maximally portable.
|
||||
|
||||
7. **No agents, no hooks, no slash-commands** — README hints at `/page-cro` invocations, but no `commands/` directory exists. These are skill-name invocations the Claude Code plugin loader produces automatically.
|
||||
|
||||
## Takeaways for Matt's infra goals
|
||||
|
||||
- **Multi-plugin marketplace (goal 2)**: this repo is *not* a model for that — single-plugin marketplace. The marketplace.json schema does support multiple `plugins[]` entries pointing to different `source` paths, so for themed groups Matt would want each plugin to live in its own subdir (e.g. `plugins/architecture/`, `plugins/typescript/`) each with their own `skills/`. coreyhaines31 doesn't demonstrate this.
|
||||
- **Codex (goal 3)**: cheap — drop AGENTS.md at root, keep SKILL.md spec-compliant, claim compatibility. No separate manifest needed.
|
||||
- **vercel-labs CLI (goal 1)**: zero work — once `skills/<name>/SKILL.md` exists with valid frontmatter, the CLI picks it up. coreyhaines31 added nothing extra.
|
||||
- **Docs site (goal 4)**: not modeled here; this repo opts out and links to a separately-hosted marketing site.
|
||||
- **Worth copying**: the `sync-skills.js` + GitHub Action pattern (auto-rewrite README table and marketplace skill list on push), the `VERSIONS.md` + auto-update protocol, the `evals/evals.json` per skill, and the AGENTS.md note about keeping `` !`command` `` out of cross-agent SKILL.md.
|
||||
|
||||
## Key file paths
|
||||
|
||||
(all on `main` branch of `coreyhaines31/marketingskills`)
|
||||
|
||||
- `/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`, `/.claude-plugin/plugin.json`
|
||||
- `/.github/scripts/sync-skills.js`
|
||||
- `/.github/workflows/sync-skills.yml`, `/.github/workflows/validate-skill.yml`
|
||||
- `/AGENTS.md` (the canonical agent guide; `CLAUDE.md` just points to it)
|
||||
- `/VERSIONS.md`
|
||||
- `/skills/<name>/SKILL.md` + `/skills/<name>/evals/evals.json` + `/skills/<name>/references/*.md`
|
||||
- `/validate-skills.sh`, `/validate-skills-official.sh`
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
|
||||
# Research: `obra/superpowers`
|
||||
|
||||
A single plugin/skills bundle that ships itself as a Claude Code plugin, a Codex plugin, a Cursor plugin, an OpenCode plugin, and a Gemini extension *simultaneously* by colocating every harness's manifest at the repo root.
|
||||
|
||||
## Repo structure
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
.claude-plugin/ marketplace.json + plugin.json (Claude Code)
|
||||
.codex-plugin/ plugin.json (Codex App)
|
||||
.codex/ INSTALL.md (Codex CLI bootstrap docs)
|
||||
.cursor-plugin/ plugin.json (Cursor)
|
||||
.opencode/ INSTALL.md + plugins/superpowers.js (OpenCode)
|
||||
gemini-extension.json (Gemini CLI)
|
||||
agents/ code-reviewer.md
|
||||
commands/ brainstorm.md, execute-plan.md, write-plan.md
|
||||
hooks/ hooks.json, hooks-cursor.json, run-hook.cmd, session-start
|
||||
skills/ 14 top-level SKILL.md folders (FLAT, not nested)
|
||||
docs/ handwritten markdown — README.codex.md, README.opencode.md, plans/, specs/
|
||||
scripts/ bump-version.sh, sync-to-codex-plugin.sh
|
||||
tests/ brainstorm-server, claude-code, codex-plugin-sync, opencode, skill-triggering, subagent-driven-dev
|
||||
assets/ icons, logos
|
||||
package.json, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, RELEASE-NOTES.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
No `dist/`, no `plugins/` subdir, no nested skills. All skills live at `skills/<kebab-name>/SKILL.md` (14 of them). Skills can have sibling reference files or a `references/` subdir.
|
||||
|
||||
## Plugin packaging — multi-harness, not multi-plugin
|
||||
|
||||
The repo ships **one logical plugin packaged six ways**:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Claude Code**: `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` + `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` (the marketplace declares a single plugin named `superpowers` with `"source": "./"`, so the repo *is* its own dev marketplace).
|
||||
- **Codex App**: `.codex-plugin/plugin.json` — much richer than the Claude one, includes an `interface` block (`displayName`, `shortDescription`, `defaultPrompt`, `brandColor`, `composerIcon`, `logo`, `category: "Coding"`).
|
||||
- **Cursor**: `.cursor-plugin/plugin.json` — declares `skills`, `agents`, `commands`, `hooks: ./hooks/hooks-cursor.json`.
|
||||
- **OpenCode**: `.opencode/plugins/superpowers.js` — a real JS module that injects bootstrap context via system-prompt transform and parses SKILL.md frontmatter at runtime.
|
||||
- **Codex CLI**: install via `git clone` + `ln -s skills ~/.agents/skills/superpowers` (no plugin manifest, uses native skill discovery).
|
||||
- **Gemini CLI**: `gemini-extension.json` with `contextFileName: "GEMINI.md"`.
|
||||
|
||||
The **separate marketplace repo** `obra/superpowers-marketplace` is where themed grouping happens. Its `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` lists 7 plugins by remote git URL: `superpowers`, `superpowers-chrome`, `elements-of-style`, `episodic-memory`, `superpowers-lab`, `superpowers-developing-for-claude-code`, `superpowers-dev`. Each entry is `{name, source: {source: "url", url}, description, version, strict: true}`. So the marketplace is a thin curation layer pointing at independent plugin repos — **no monorepo, no themed sub-plugins inside one repo**.
|
||||
|
||||
## Build tooling
|
||||
|
||||
`package.json` is minimal — just `name`, `version`, `type: "module"`, `main` pointing at the OpenCode plugin file. **No scripts, no dependencies, no build step, no TypeScript.** Manifests are handwritten and kept in sync by a custom version-bump tool.
|
||||
|
||||
Two interesting scripts:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **`scripts/bump-version.sh`** — driven by `.version-bump.json`, which lists every file containing a version field (`package.json`, `.claude-plugin/plugin.json`, `.cursor-plugin/plugin.json`, `.codex-plugin/plugin.json`, `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` at `plugins.0.version`, `gemini-extension.json`). Has `--check` (drift detection) and `--audit` (greps repo for stale version strings). Pure bash + jq.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **`scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh`** — ~300-line bash tool that rsyncs the upstream tree into a fork (`prime-radiant-inc/openai-codex-plugins/plugins/superpowers/`), opens a PR via `gh`. Has `--dry-run`, `--bootstrap`, `--local`. Deterministic: same upstream SHA → identical PR diff. This is how the Codex App marketplace gets updated.
|
||||
|
||||
## Installation story
|
||||
|
||||
**No `npx` installer of its own.** Installation is per-harness:
|
||||
|
||||
- Claude Code: `/plugin marketplace add obra/superpowers-marketplace` then `/plugin install superpowers@superpowers-marketplace`, OR Anthropic's official marketplace `/plugin install superpowers@claude-plugins-official`.
|
||||
- Codex App: search & install via in-app plugin UI.
|
||||
- Codex CLI: clone + symlink (manual).
|
||||
- Cursor: `/add-plugin superpowers`.
|
||||
- OpenCode: tell agent to fetch `INSTALL.md`.
|
||||
- Gemini: `gemini extensions install https://github.com/obra/superpowers`.
|
||||
- Copilot CLI: `copilot plugin marketplace add obra/superpowers-marketplace`.
|
||||
|
||||
Vercel-labs/skills is **not mentioned anywhere**.
|
||||
|
||||
## Docs site
|
||||
|
||||
**There is no docs site.** No Docusaurus/Nextra/Astro/Starlight, no GitHub Pages (`has_pages: false`). `docs/` is a flat folder of handwritten markdown plus design specs dated YYYY-MM-DD. All discovery happens via the README plus per-harness INSTALL.md files.
|
||||
|
||||
## CI / release
|
||||
|
||||
`.github/` contains only `FUNDING.yml`, `ISSUE_TEMPLATE/`, and `PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md` — **no GitHub Actions workflows**. Releases appear to be manual: bump versions with the script, push tag, the marketplace repo points at git URLs (and `superpowers-dev` entry pins `ref: "dev"`).
|
||||
|
||||
## SKILL.md format
|
||||
|
||||
Frontmatter is intentionally minimal — only `name` and `description`:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: test-driven-development
|
||||
description: Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code
|
||||
---
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Body uses heavy XML-style emphasis tags (`<EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>`, `<SUBAGENT-STOP>`, `<important-reminder>`) and prescriptive uppercase rules. No tags, no allowed-tools, no version field per skill.
|
||||
|
||||
## Distinctive patterns
|
||||
|
||||
- **Bootstrap via SessionStart hook**: `hooks/hooks.json` registers a `SessionStart` (matchers `startup|clear|compact`) that runs `hooks/run-hook.cmd session-start`, which reads `skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md` and injects it as additional system context — this is how skills "trigger automatically" without the user opting in.
|
||||
- **`using-superpowers` as meta-skill**: forces the agent to invoke the Skill tool *before any reply, including clarifying questions*.
|
||||
- **OpenCode runtime SKILL.md parser**: `.opencode/plugins/superpowers.js` reimplements frontmatter extraction inline ("avoid dependency on skills-core for bootstrap").
|
||||
- **Tests for skill triggering**: `tests/skill-triggering/`, `tests/codex-plugin-sync/`, `tests/opencode/` — actual integration tests for whether agents invoke the right skill.
|
||||
- **Multi-harness CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md/GEMINI.md** at root, one per agent's convention.
|
||||
- **Spec-driven development** visible in `docs/superpowers/specs/`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Implications for Matt's repo
|
||||
|
||||
- **Multi-plugin themed marketplace**: superpowers' pattern is **separate plugin repos + one curation repo with `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`** listing them by URL — *not* a monorepo. If Matt wants a monorepo, he'd be inventing a different pattern.
|
||||
- **Codex support**: cheapest path is `.codex-plugin/plugin.json` at root (Codex App) plus `.codex/INSTALL.md` for CLI clone+symlink. No build step needed.
|
||||
- **Docs site**: superpowers offers no precedent — Matt would be ahead of it.
|
||||
- **Build tooling**: superpowers proves you can run a popular skills plugin with **zero npm scripts** and just two bash scripts (version bump + cross-repo sync). The `.version-bump.json` config-driven approach is worth copying.
|
||||
- **SKILL.md conventions**: keep frontmatter to `name` + `description`; lean on body prose for behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
## Key URLs
|
||||
|
||||
- https://github.com/obra/superpowers/blob/main/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json
|
||||
- https://github.com/obra/superpowers/blob/main/.codex-plugin/plugin.json
|
||||
- https://github.com/obra/superpowers/blob/main/.opencode/plugins/superpowers.js
|
||||
- https://github.com/obra/superpowers/blob/main/scripts/bump-version.sh
|
||||
- https://github.com/obra/superpowers/blob/main/scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh
|
||||
- https://github.com/obra/superpowers/blob/main/hooks/hooks.json
|
||||
- https://github.com/obra/superpowers-marketplace/blob/main/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json
|
||||
@@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
|
||||
#!/usr/bin/env bash
|
||||
set -euo pipefail
|
||||
|
||||
# Links all skills in the repository to ~/.claude/skills, so that
|
||||
# they can be used by the local Claude CLI.
|
||||
|
||||
REPO="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")/.." && pwd)"
|
||||
DEST="$HOME/.claude/skills"
|
||||
|
||||
# If ~/.claude/skills is a symlink that resolves into this repo, we'd end up
|
||||
# writing the per-skill symlinks back into the repo's own skills/ tree. Detect
|
||||
# and bail out instead of polluting the working copy.
|
||||
if [ -L "$DEST" ]; then
|
||||
resolved="$(readlink -f "$DEST")"
|
||||
case "$resolved" in
|
||||
"$REPO"|"$REPO"/*)
|
||||
echo "error: $DEST is a symlink into this repo ($resolved)." >&2
|
||||
echo "Remove it (rm \"$DEST\") and re-run; the script will recreate it as a real dir." >&2
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
;;
|
||||
esac
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
mkdir -p "$DEST"
|
||||
|
||||
find "$REPO/skills" -name SKILL.md -not -path '*/node_modules/*' -print0 |
|
||||
while IFS= read -r -d '' skill_md; do
|
||||
src="$(dirname "$skill_md")"
|
||||
name="$(basename "$src")"
|
||||
target="$DEST/$name"
|
||||
|
||||
if [ -e "$target" ] && [ ! -L "$target" ]; then
|
||||
rm -rf "$target"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
ln -sfn "$src" "$target"
|
||||
echo "linked $name -> $src"
|
||||
done
|
||||
@@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
|
||||
#!/usr/bin/env bash
|
||||
set -euo pipefail
|
||||
|
||||
REPO="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")/.." && pwd)"
|
||||
|
||||
cd "$REPO"
|
||||
find . -name SKILL.md -not -path '*/node_modules/*' | sed 's|^\./||' | sort
|
||||
@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Deprecated
|
||||
|
||||
Skills I no longer use.
|
||||
|
||||
- **[design-an-interface](./design-an-interface/SKILL.md)** — Generate multiple radically different interface designs for a module using parallel sub-agents.
|
||||
- **[qa](./qa/SKILL.md)** — Interactive QA session where user reports bugs conversationally and the agent files GitHub issues.
|
||||
- **[request-refactor-plan](./request-refactor-plan/SKILL.md)** — Create a detailed refactor plan with tiny commits via user interview, then file it as a GitHub issue.
|
||||
- **[ubiquitous-language](./ubiquitous-language/SKILL.md)** — Extract a DDD-style ubiquitous language glossary from the current conversation.
|
||||
@@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Engineering
|
||||
|
||||
Skills I use daily for code work.
|
||||
|
||||
- **[diagnose](./diagnose/SKILL.md)** — Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions: reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test.
|
||||
- **[grill-with-docs](./grill-with-docs/SKILL.md)** — Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates `CONTEXT.md` and ADRs inline.
|
||||
- **[triage](./triage/SKILL.md)** — Triage issues through a state machine of triage roles.
|
||||
- **[improve-codebase-architecture](./improve-codebase-architecture/SKILL.md)** — Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in `CONTEXT.md` and the decisions in `docs/adr/`.
|
||||
- **[setup-matt-pocock-skills](./setup-matt-pocock-skills/SKILL.md)** — Scaffold the per-repo config (issue tracker, triage label vocabulary, domain doc layout) that the other engineering skills consume.
|
||||
- **[tdd](./tdd/SKILL.md)** — Test-driven development with a red-green-refactor loop. Builds features or fixes bugs one vertical slice at a time.
|
||||
- **[to-issues](./to-issues/SKILL.md)** — Break any plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable GitHub issues using vertical slices.
|
||||
- **[to-prd](./to-prd/SKILL.md)** — Turn the current conversation context into a PRD and submit it as a GitHub issue.
|
||||
- **[zoom-out](./zoom-out/SKILL.md)** — Tell the agent to zoom out and give broader context or a higher-level perspective on an unfamiliar section of code.
|
||||
@@ -1,117 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: diagnose
|
||||
description: Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Diagnose
|
||||
|
||||
A discipline for hard bugs. Skip phases only when explicitly justified.
|
||||
|
||||
When exploring the codebase, use the project's domain glossary to get a clear mental model of the relevant modules, and check ADRs in the area you're touching.
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 1 — Build a feedback loop
|
||||
|
||||
**This is the skill.** Everything else is mechanical. If you have a fast, deterministic, agent-runnable pass/fail signal for the bug, you will find the cause — bisection, hypothesis-testing, and instrumentation all just consume that signal. If you don't have one, no amount of staring at code will save you.
|
||||
|
||||
Spend disproportionate effort here. **Be aggressive. Be creative. Refuse to give up.**
|
||||
|
||||
### Ways to construct one — try them in roughly this order
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Failing test** at whatever seam reaches the bug — unit, integration, e2e.
|
||||
2. **Curl / HTTP script** against a running dev server.
|
||||
3. **CLI invocation** with a fixture input, diffing stdout against a known-good snapshot.
|
||||
4. **Headless browser script** (Playwright / Puppeteer) — drives the UI, asserts on DOM/console/network.
|
||||
5. **Replay a captured trace.** Save a real network request / payload / event log to disk; replay it through the code path in isolation.
|
||||
6. **Throwaway harness.** Spin up a minimal subset of the system (one service, mocked deps) that exercises the bug code path with a single function call.
|
||||
7. **Property / fuzz loop.** If the bug is "sometimes wrong output", run 1000 random inputs and look for the failure mode.
|
||||
8. **Bisection harness.** If the bug appeared between two known states (commit, dataset, version), automate "boot at state X, check, repeat" so you can `git bisect run` it.
|
||||
9. **Differential loop.** Run the same input through old-version vs new-version (or two configs) and diff outputs.
|
||||
10. **HITL bash script.** Last resort. If a human must click, drive _them_ with `scripts/hitl-loop.template.sh` so the loop is still structured. Captured output feeds back to you.
|
||||
|
||||
Build the right feedback loop, and the bug is 90% fixed.
|
||||
|
||||
### Iterate on the loop itself
|
||||
|
||||
Treat the loop as a product. Once you have _a_ loop, ask:
|
||||
|
||||
- Can I make it faster? (Cache setup, skip unrelated init, narrow the test scope.)
|
||||
- Can I make the signal sharper? (Assert on the specific symptom, not "didn't crash".)
|
||||
- Can I make it more deterministic? (Pin time, seed RNG, isolate filesystem, freeze network.)
|
||||
|
||||
A 30-second flaky loop is barely better than no loop. A 2-second deterministic loop is a debugging superpower.
|
||||
|
||||
### Non-deterministic bugs
|
||||
|
||||
The goal is not a clean repro but a **higher reproduction rate**. Loop the trigger 100×, parallelise, add stress, narrow timing windows, inject sleeps. A 50%-flake bug is debuggable; 1% is not — keep raising the rate until it's debuggable.
|
||||
|
||||
### When you genuinely cannot build a loop
|
||||
|
||||
Stop and say so explicitly. List what you tried. Ask the user for: (a) access to whatever environment reproduces it, (b) a captured artifact (HAR file, log dump, core dump, screen recording with timestamps), or (c) permission to add temporary production instrumentation. Do **not** proceed to hypothesise without a loop.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not proceed to Phase 2 until you have a loop you believe in.
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 2 — Reproduce
|
||||
|
||||
Run the loop. Watch the bug appear.
|
||||
|
||||
Confirm:
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] The loop produces the failure mode the **user** described — not a different failure that happens to be nearby. Wrong bug = wrong fix.
|
||||
- [ ] The failure is reproducible across multiple runs (or, for non-deterministic bugs, reproducible at a high enough rate to debug against).
|
||||
- [ ] You have captured the exact symptom (error message, wrong output, slow timing) so later phases can verify the fix actually addresses it.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not proceed until you reproduce the bug.
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 3 — Hypothesise
|
||||
|
||||
Generate **3–5 ranked hypotheses** before testing any of them. Single-hypothesis generation anchors on the first plausible idea.
|
||||
|
||||
Each hypothesis must be **falsifiable**: state the prediction it makes.
|
||||
|
||||
> Format: "If <X> is the cause, then <changing Y> will make the bug disappear / <changing Z> will make it worse."
|
||||
|
||||
If you cannot state the prediction, the hypothesis is a vibe — discard or sharpen it.
|
||||
|
||||
**Show the ranked list to the user before testing.** They often have domain knowledge that re-ranks instantly ("we just deployed a change to #3"), or know hypotheses they've already ruled out. Cheap checkpoint, big time saver. Don't block on it — proceed with your ranking if the user is AFK.
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 4 — Instrument
|
||||
|
||||
Each probe must map to a specific prediction from Phase 3. **Change one variable at a time.**
|
||||
|
||||
Tool preference:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Debugger / REPL inspection** if the env supports it. One breakpoint beats ten logs.
|
||||
2. **Targeted logs** at the boundaries that distinguish hypotheses.
|
||||
3. Never "log everything and grep".
|
||||
|
||||
**Tag every debug log** with a unique prefix, e.g. `[DEBUG-a4f2]`. Cleanup at the end becomes a single grep. Untagged logs survive; tagged logs die.
|
||||
|
||||
**Perf branch.** For performance regressions, logs are usually wrong. Instead: establish a baseline measurement (timing harness, `performance.now()`, profiler, query plan), then bisect. Measure first, fix second.
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 5 — Fix + regression test
|
||||
|
||||
Write the regression test **before the fix** — but only if there is a **correct seam** for it.
|
||||
|
||||
A correct seam is one where the test exercises the **real bug pattern** as it occurs at the call site. If the only available seam is too shallow (single-caller test when the bug needs multiple callers, unit test that can't replicate the chain that triggered the bug), a regression test there gives false confidence.
|
||||
|
||||
**If no correct seam exists, that itself is the finding.** Note it. The codebase architecture is preventing the bug from being locked down. Flag this for the next phase.
|
||||
|
||||
If a correct seam exists:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Turn the minimised repro into a failing test at that seam.
|
||||
2. Watch it fail.
|
||||
3. Apply the fix.
|
||||
4. Watch it pass.
|
||||
5. Re-run the Phase 1 feedback loop against the original (un-minimised) scenario.
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 6 — Cleanup + post-mortem
|
||||
|
||||
Required before declaring done:
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Original repro no longer reproduces (re-run the Phase 1 loop)
|
||||
- [ ] Regression test passes (or absence of seam is documented)
|
||||
- [ ] All `[DEBUG-...]` instrumentation removed (`grep` the prefix)
|
||||
- [ ] Throwaway prototypes deleted (or moved to a clearly-marked debug location)
|
||||
- [ ] The hypothesis that turned out correct is stated in the commit / PR message — so the next debugger learns
|
||||
|
||||
**Then ask: what would have prevented this bug?** If the answer involves architectural change (no good test seam, tangled callers, hidden coupling) hand off to the `/improve-codebase-architecture` skill with the specifics. Make the recommendation **after** the fix is in, not before — you have more information now than when you started.
|
||||
@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
|
||||
#!/usr/bin/env bash
|
||||
# Human-in-the-loop reproduction loop.
|
||||
# Copy this file, edit the steps below, and run it.
|
||||
# The agent runs the script; the user follows prompts in their terminal.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Usage:
|
||||
# bash hitl-loop.template.sh
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Two helpers:
|
||||
# step "<instruction>" → show instruction, wait for Enter
|
||||
# capture VAR "<question>" → show question, read response into VAR
|
||||
#
|
||||
# At the end, captured values are printed as KEY=VALUE for the agent to parse.
|
||||
|
||||
set -euo pipefail
|
||||
|
||||
step() {
|
||||
printf '\n>>> %s\n' "$1"
|
||||
read -r -p " [Enter when done] " _
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
capture() {
|
||||
local var="$1" question="$2" answer
|
||||
printf '\n>>> %s\n' "$question"
|
||||
read -r -p " > " answer
|
||||
printf -v "$var" '%s' "$answer"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# --- edit below ---------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
step "Open the app at http://localhost:3000 and sign in."
|
||||
|
||||
capture ERRORED "Click the 'Export' button. Did it throw an error? (y/n)"
|
||||
|
||||
capture ERROR_MSG "Paste the error message (or 'none'):"
|
||||
|
||||
# --- edit above ---------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
printf '\n--- Captured ---\n'
|
||||
printf 'ERRORED=%s\n' "$ERRORED"
|
||||
printf 'ERROR_MSG=%s\n' "$ERROR_MSG"
|
||||
@@ -1,121 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: setup-matt-pocock-skills
|
||||
description: Sets up an `## Agent skills` block in AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md and `docs/agents/` so the engineering skills know this repo's issue tracker (GitHub or local markdown), triage label vocabulary, and domain doc layout. Run before first use of `to-issues`, `to-prd`, `triage`, `diagnose`, `tdd`, `improve-codebase-architecture`, or `zoom-out` — or if those skills appear to be missing context about the issue tracker, triage labels, or domain docs.
|
||||
disable-model-invocation: true
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Setup Matt Pocock's Skills
|
||||
|
||||
Scaffold the per-repo configuration that the engineering skills assume:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Issue tracker** — where issues live (GitHub by default; local markdown is also supported out of the box)
|
||||
- **Triage labels** — the strings used for the five canonical triage roles
|
||||
- **Domain docs** — where `CONTEXT.md` and ADRs live, and the consumer rules for reading them
|
||||
|
||||
This is a prompt-driven skill, not a deterministic script. Explore, present what you found, confirm with the user, then write.
|
||||
|
||||
## Process
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Explore
|
||||
|
||||
Look at the current repo to understand its starting state. Read whatever exists; don't assume:
|
||||
|
||||
- `git remote -v` and `.git/config` — is this a GitHub repo? Which one?
|
||||
- `AGENTS.md` and `CLAUDE.md` at the repo root — does either exist? Is there already an `## Agent skills` section in either?
|
||||
- `CONTEXT.md` and `CONTEXT-MAP.md` at the repo root
|
||||
- `docs/adr/` and any `src/*/docs/adr/` directories
|
||||
- `docs/agents/` — does this skill's prior output already exist?
|
||||
- `.scratch/` — sign that a local-markdown issue tracker convention is already in use
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Present findings and ask
|
||||
|
||||
Summarise what's present and what's missing. Then walk the user through the three decisions **one at a time** — present a section, get the user's answer, then move to the next. Don't dump all three at once.
|
||||
|
||||
Assume the user does not know what these terms mean. Each section starts with a short explainer (what it is, why these skills need it, what changes if they pick differently). Then show the choices and the default.
|
||||
|
||||
**Section A — Issue tracker.**
|
||||
|
||||
> Explainer: The "issue tracker" is where issues live for this repo. Skills like `to-issues`, `triage`, `to-prd`, and `qa` read from and write to it — they need to know whether to call `gh issue create`, write a markdown file under `.scratch/`, or follow some other workflow you describe. Pick the place you actually track work for this repo.
|
||||
|
||||
Default posture: these skills were designed for GitHub. If a `git remote` points at GitHub, propose that. If a `git remote` points at GitLab (`gitlab.com` or a self-hosted host), propose GitLab. Otherwise (or if the user prefers), offer:
|
||||
|
||||
- **GitHub** — issues live in the repo's GitHub Issues (uses the `gh` CLI)
|
||||
- **GitLab** — issues live in the repo's GitLab Issues (uses the [`glab`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/cli) CLI)
|
||||
- **Local markdown** — issues live as files under `.scratch/<feature>/` in this repo (good for solo projects or repos without a remote)
|
||||
- **Other** (Jira, Linear, etc.) — ask the user to describe the workflow in one paragraph; the skill will record it as freeform prose
|
||||
|
||||
**Section B — Triage label vocabulary.**
|
||||
|
||||
> Explainer: When the `triage` skill processes an incoming issue, it moves it through a state machine — needs evaluation, waiting on reporter, ready for an AFK agent to pick up, ready for a human, or won't fix. To do that, it needs to apply labels (or the equivalent in your issue tracker) that match strings *you've actually configured*. If your repo already uses different label names (e.g. `bug:triage` instead of `needs-triage`), map them here so the skill applies the right ones instead of creating duplicates.
|
||||
|
||||
The five canonical roles:
|
||||
|
||||
- `needs-triage` — maintainer needs to evaluate
|
||||
- `needs-info` — waiting on reporter
|
||||
- `ready-for-agent` — fully specified, AFK-ready (an agent can pick it up with no human context)
|
||||
- `ready-for-human` — needs human implementation
|
||||
- `wontfix` — will not be actioned
|
||||
|
||||
Default: each role's string equals its name. Ask the user if they want to override any. If their issue tracker has no existing labels, the defaults are fine.
|
||||
|
||||
**Section C — Domain docs.**
|
||||
|
||||
> Explainer: Some skills (`improve-codebase-architecture`, `diagnose`, `tdd`) read a `CONTEXT.md` file to learn the project's domain language, and `docs/adr/` for past architectural decisions. They need to know whether the repo has one global context or multiple (e.g. a monorepo with separate frontend/backend contexts) so they look in the right place.
|
||||
|
||||
Confirm the layout:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Single-context** — one `CONTEXT.md` + `docs/adr/` at the repo root. Most repos are this.
|
||||
- **Multi-context** — `CONTEXT-MAP.md` at the root pointing to per-context `CONTEXT.md` files (typically a monorepo).
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Confirm and edit
|
||||
|
||||
Show the user a draft of:
|
||||
|
||||
- The `## Agent skills` block to add to whichever of `CLAUDE.md` / `AGENTS.md` is being edited (see step 4 for selection rules)
|
||||
- The contents of `docs/agents/issue-tracker.md`, `docs/agents/triage-labels.md`, `docs/agents/domain.md`
|
||||
|
||||
Let them edit before writing.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Write
|
||||
|
||||
**Pick the file to edit:**
|
||||
|
||||
- If `CLAUDE.md` exists, edit it.
|
||||
- Else if `AGENTS.md` exists, edit it.
|
||||
- If neither exists, ask the user which one to create — don't pick for them.
|
||||
|
||||
Never create `AGENTS.md` when `CLAUDE.md` already exists (or vice versa) — always edit the one that's already there.
|
||||
|
||||
If an `## Agent skills` block already exists in the chosen file, update its contents in-place rather than appending a duplicate. Don't overwrite user edits to the surrounding sections.
|
||||
|
||||
The block:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Agent skills
|
||||
|
||||
### Issue tracker
|
||||
|
||||
[one-line summary of where issues are tracked]. See `docs/agents/issue-tracker.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
### Triage labels
|
||||
|
||||
[one-line summary of the label vocabulary]. See `docs/agents/triage-labels.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
### Domain docs
|
||||
|
||||
[one-line summary of layout — "single-context" or "multi-context"]. See `docs/agents/domain.md`.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Then write the three docs files using the seed templates in this skill folder as a starting point:
|
||||
|
||||
- [issue-tracker-github.md](./issue-tracker-github.md) — GitHub issue tracker
|
||||
- [issue-tracker-gitlab.md](./issue-tracker-gitlab.md) — GitLab issue tracker
|
||||
- [issue-tracker-local.md](./issue-tracker-local.md) — local-markdown issue tracker
|
||||
- [triage-labels.md](./triage-labels.md) — label mapping
|
||||
- [domain.md](./domain.md) — domain doc consumer rules + layout
|
||||
|
||||
For "other" issue trackers, write `docs/agents/issue-tracker.md` from scratch using the user's description.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Done
|
||||
|
||||
Tell the user the setup is complete and which engineering skills will now read from these files. Mention they can edit `docs/agents/*.md` directly later — re-running this skill is only necessary if they want to switch issue trackers or restart from scratch.
|
||||
@@ -1,51 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Domain Docs
|
||||
|
||||
How the engineering skills should consume this repo's domain documentation when exploring the codebase.
|
||||
|
||||
## Before exploring, read these
|
||||
|
||||
- **`CONTEXT.md`** at the repo root, or
|
||||
- **`CONTEXT-MAP.md`** at the repo root if it exists — it points at one `CONTEXT.md` per context. Read each one relevant to the topic.
|
||||
- **`docs/adr/`** — read ADRs that touch the area you're about to work in. In multi-context repos, also check `src/<context>/docs/adr/` for context-scoped decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
If any of these files don't exist, **proceed silently**. Don't flag their absence; don't suggest creating them upfront. The producer skill (`/grill-with-docs`) creates them lazily when terms or decisions actually get resolved.
|
||||
|
||||
## File structure
|
||||
|
||||
Single-context repo (most repos):
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/
|
||||
├── CONTEXT.md
|
||||
├── docs/adr/
|
||||
│ ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
|
||||
│ └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
|
||||
└── src/
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Multi-context repo (presence of `CONTEXT-MAP.md` at the root):
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/
|
||||
├── CONTEXT-MAP.md
|
||||
├── docs/adr/ ← system-wide decisions
|
||||
└── src/
|
||||
├── ordering/
|
||||
│ ├── CONTEXT.md
|
||||
│ └── docs/adr/ ← context-specific decisions
|
||||
└── billing/
|
||||
├── CONTEXT.md
|
||||
└── docs/adr/
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Use the glossary's vocabulary
|
||||
|
||||
When your output names a domain concept (in an issue title, a refactor proposal, a hypothesis, a test name), use the term as defined in `CONTEXT.md`. Don't drift to synonyms the glossary explicitly avoids.
|
||||
|
||||
If the concept you need isn't in the glossary yet, that's a signal — either you're inventing language the project doesn't use (reconsider) or there's a real gap (note it for `/grill-with-docs`).
|
||||
|
||||
## Flag ADR conflicts
|
||||
|
||||
If your output contradicts an existing ADR, surface it explicitly rather than silently overriding:
|
||||
|
||||
> _Contradicts ADR-0007 (event-sourced orders) — but worth reopening because…_
|
||||
@@ -1,22 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Issue tracker: GitHub
|
||||
|
||||
Issues and PRDs for this repo live as GitHub issues. Use the `gh` CLI for all operations.
|
||||
|
||||
## Conventions
|
||||
|
||||
- **Create an issue**: `gh issue create --title "..." --body "..."`. Use a heredoc for multi-line bodies.
|
||||
- **Read an issue**: `gh issue view <number> --comments`, filtering comments by `jq` and also fetching labels.
|
||||
- **List issues**: `gh issue list --state open --json number,title,body,labels,comments --jq '[.[] | {number, title, body, labels: [.labels[].name], comments: [.comments[].body]}]'` with appropriate `--label` and `--state` filters.
|
||||
- **Comment on an issue**: `gh issue comment <number> --body "..."`
|
||||
- **Apply / remove labels**: `gh issue edit <number> --add-label "..."` / `--remove-label "..."`
|
||||
- **Close**: `gh issue close <number> --comment "..."`
|
||||
|
||||
Infer the repo from `git remote -v` — `gh` does this automatically when run inside a clone.
|
||||
|
||||
## When a skill says "publish to the issue tracker"
|
||||
|
||||
Create a GitHub issue.
|
||||
|
||||
## When a skill says "fetch the relevant ticket"
|
||||
|
||||
Run `gh issue view <number> --comments`.
|
||||
@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Issue tracker: GitLab
|
||||
|
||||
Issues and PRDs for this repo live as GitLab issues. Use the [`glab`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/cli) CLI for all operations.
|
||||
|
||||
## Conventions
|
||||
|
||||
- **Create an issue**: `glab issue create --title "..." --description "..."`. Use a heredoc for multi-line descriptions. Pass `--description -` to open an editor.
|
||||
- **Read an issue**: `glab issue view <number> --comments`. Use `-F json` for machine-readable output.
|
||||
- **List issues**: `glab issue list --state opened -F json` with appropriate `--label` filters. Note that GitLab uses `opened` (not `open`) for the state value.
|
||||
- **Comment on an issue**: `glab issue note <number> --message "..."`. GitLab calls comments "notes".
|
||||
- **Apply / remove labels**: `glab issue update <number> --label "..."` / `--unlabel "..."`. Multiple labels can be comma-separated or by repeating the flag.
|
||||
- **Close**: `glab issue close <number>`. `glab issue close` does not accept a closing comment, so post the explanation first with `glab issue note <number> --message "..."`, then close.
|
||||
- **Merge requests**: GitLab calls PRs "merge requests". Use `glab mr create`, `glab mr view`, `glab mr note`, etc. — the same shape as `gh pr ...` with `mr` in place of `pr` and `note`/`--message` in place of `comment`/`--body`.
|
||||
|
||||
Infer the repo from `git remote -v` — `glab` does this automatically when run inside a clone.
|
||||
|
||||
## When a skill says "publish to the issue tracker"
|
||||
|
||||
Create a GitLab issue.
|
||||
|
||||
## When a skill says "fetch the relevant ticket"
|
||||
|
||||
Run `glab issue view <number> --comments`.
|
||||
@@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Issue tracker: Local Markdown
|
||||
|
||||
Issues and PRDs for this repo live as markdown files in `.scratch/`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Conventions
|
||||
|
||||
- One feature per directory: `.scratch/<feature-slug>/`
|
||||
- The PRD is `.scratch/<feature-slug>/PRD.md`
|
||||
- Implementation issues are `.scratch/<feature-slug>/issues/<NN>-<slug>.md`, numbered from `01`
|
||||
- Triage state is recorded as a `Status:` line near the top of each issue file (see `triage-labels.md` for the role strings)
|
||||
- Comments and conversation history append to the bottom of the file under a `## Comments` heading
|
||||
|
||||
## When a skill says "publish to the issue tracker"
|
||||
|
||||
Create a new file under `.scratch/<feature-slug>/` (creating the directory if needed).
|
||||
|
||||
## When a skill says "fetch the relevant ticket"
|
||||
|
||||
Read the file at the referenced path. The user will normally pass the path or the issue number directly.
|
||||
@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Triage Labels
|
||||
|
||||
The skills speak in terms of five canonical triage roles. This file maps those roles to the actual label strings used in this repo's issue tracker.
|
||||
|
||||
| Label in mattpocock/skills | Label in our tracker | Meaning |
|
||||
| -------------------------- | -------------------- | ---------------------------------------- |
|
||||
| `needs-triage` | `needs-triage` | Maintainer needs to evaluate this issue |
|
||||
| `needs-info` | `needs-info` | Waiting on reporter for more information |
|
||||
| `ready-for-agent` | `ready-for-agent` | Fully specified, ready for an AFK agent |
|
||||
| `ready-for-human` | `ready-for-human` | Requires human implementation |
|
||||
| `wontfix` | `wontfix` | Will not be actioned |
|
||||
|
||||
When a skill mentions a role (e.g. "apply the AFK-ready triage label"), use the corresponding label string from this table.
|
||||
|
||||
Edit the right-hand column to match whatever vocabulary you actually use.
|
||||
@@ -1,103 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: triage
|
||||
description: Triage issues through a state machine driven by triage roles. Use when user wants to create an issue, triage issues, review incoming bugs or feature requests, prepare issues for an AFK agent, or manage issue workflow.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Triage
|
||||
|
||||
Move issues on the project issue tracker through a small state machine of triage roles.
|
||||
|
||||
Every comment or issue posted to the issue tracker during triage **must** start with this disclaimer:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
> *This was generated by AI during triage.*
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Reference docs
|
||||
|
||||
- [AGENT-BRIEF.md](AGENT-BRIEF.md) — how to write durable agent briefs
|
||||
- [OUT-OF-SCOPE.md](OUT-OF-SCOPE.md) — how the `.out-of-scope/` knowledge base works
|
||||
|
||||
## Roles
|
||||
|
||||
Two **category** roles:
|
||||
|
||||
- `bug` — something is broken
|
||||
- `enhancement` — new feature or improvement
|
||||
|
||||
Five **state** roles:
|
||||
|
||||
- `needs-triage` — maintainer needs to evaluate
|
||||
- `needs-info` — waiting on reporter for more information
|
||||
- `ready-for-agent` — fully specified, ready for an AFK agent
|
||||
- `ready-for-human` — needs human implementation
|
||||
- `wontfix` — will not be actioned
|
||||
|
||||
Every triaged issue should carry exactly one category role and one state role. If state roles conflict, flag it and ask the maintainer before doing anything else.
|
||||
|
||||
These are canonical role names — the actual label strings used in the issue tracker may differ. The mapping should have been provided to you - run `/setup-matt-pocock-skills` if not.
|
||||
|
||||
State transitions: an unlabeled issue normally goes to `needs-triage` first; from there it moves to `needs-info`, `ready-for-agent`, `ready-for-human`, or `wontfix`. `needs-info` returns to `needs-triage` once the reporter replies. The maintainer can override at any time — flag transitions that look unusual and ask before proceeding.
|
||||
|
||||
## Invocation
|
||||
|
||||
The maintainer invokes `/triage` and describes what they want in natural language. Interpret the request and act. Examples:
|
||||
|
||||
- "Show me anything that needs my attention"
|
||||
- "Let's look at #42"
|
||||
- "Move #42 to ready-for-agent"
|
||||
- "What's ready for agents to pick up?"
|
||||
|
||||
## Show what needs attention
|
||||
|
||||
Query the issue tracker and present three buckets, oldest first:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Unlabeled** — never triaged.
|
||||
2. **`needs-triage`** — evaluation in progress.
|
||||
3. **`needs-info` with reporter activity since the last triage notes** — needs re-evaluation.
|
||||
|
||||
Show counts and a one-line summary per issue. Let the maintainer pick.
|
||||
|
||||
## Triage a specific issue
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Gather context.** Read the full issue (body, comments, labels, reporter, dates). Parse any prior triage notes so you don't re-ask resolved questions. Explore the codebase using the project's domain glossary, respecting ADRs in the area. Read `.out-of-scope/*.md` and surface any prior rejection that resembles this issue.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Recommend.** Tell the maintainer your category and state recommendation with reasoning, plus a brief codebase summary relevant to the issue. Wait for direction.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Reproduce (bugs only).** Before any grilling, attempt reproduction: read the reporter's steps, trace the relevant code, run tests or commands. Report what happened — successful repro with code path, failed repro, or insufficient detail (a strong `needs-info` signal). A confirmed repro makes a much stronger agent brief.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Grill (if needed).** If the issue needs fleshing out, run a `/grill-with-docs` session.
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Apply the outcome:**
|
||||
- `ready-for-agent` — post an agent brief comment ([AGENT-BRIEF.md](AGENT-BRIEF.md)).
|
||||
- `ready-for-human` — same structure as an agent brief, but note why it can't be delegated (judgment calls, external access, design decisions, manual testing).
|
||||
- `needs-info` — post triage notes (template below).
|
||||
- `wontfix` (bug) — polite explanation, then close.
|
||||
- `wontfix` (enhancement) — write to `.out-of-scope/`, link to it from a comment, then close ([OUT-OF-SCOPE.md](OUT-OF-SCOPE.md)).
|
||||
- `needs-triage` — apply the role. Optional comment if there's partial progress.
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick state override
|
||||
|
||||
If the maintainer says "move #42 to ready-for-agent", trust them and apply the role directly. Confirm what you're about to do (role changes, comment, close), then act. Skip grilling. If moving to `ready-for-agent` without a grilling session, ask whether they want to write an agent brief.
|
||||
|
||||
## Needs-info template
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Triage Notes
|
||||
|
||||
**What we've established so far:**
|
||||
|
||||
- point 1
|
||||
- point 2
|
||||
|
||||
**What we still need from you (@reporter):**
|
||||
|
||||
- question 1
|
||||
- question 2
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Capture everything resolved during grilling under "established so far" so the work isn't lost. Questions must be specific and actionable, not "please provide more info".
|
||||
|
||||
## Resuming a previous session
|
||||
|
||||
If prior triage notes exist on the issue, read them, check whether the reporter has answered any outstanding questions, and present an updated picture before continuing. Don't re-ask resolved questions.
|
||||
@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Misc
|
||||
|
||||
Tools I keep around but rarely use.
|
||||
|
||||
- **[git-guardrails-claude-code](./git-guardrails-claude-code/SKILL.md)** — Set up Claude Code hooks to block dangerous git commands (push, reset --hard, clean, etc.) before they execute.
|
||||
- **[migrate-to-shoehorn](./migrate-to-shoehorn/SKILL.md)** — Migrate test files from `as` type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn.
|
||||
- **[scaffold-exercises](./scaffold-exercises/SKILL.md)** — Create exercise directory structures with sections, problems, solutions, and explainers.
|
||||
- **[setup-pre-commit](./setup-pre-commit/SKILL.md)** — Set up Husky pre-commit hooks with lint-staged, Prettier, type checking, and tests.
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Personal
|
||||
|
||||
Skills tied to my own setup, not promoted in the plugin.
|
||||
|
||||
- **[edit-article](./edit-article/SKILL.md)** — Edit and improve articles by restructuring sections, improving clarity, and tightening prose.
|
||||
- **[obsidian-vault](./obsidian-vault/SKILL.md)** — Search, create, and manage notes in an Obsidian vault with wikilinks and index notes.
|
||||
@@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Productivity
|
||||
|
||||
General workflow tools, not code-specific.
|
||||
|
||||
- **[caveman](./caveman/SKILL.md)** — Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by dropping filler while keeping full technical accuracy.
|
||||
- **[grill-me](./grill-me/SKILL.md)** — Get relentlessly interviewed about a plan or design until every branch of the decision tree is resolved.
|
||||
- **[write-a-skill](./write-a-skill/SKILL.md)** — Create new skills with proper structure, progressive disclosure, and bundled resources.
|
||||
@@ -44,8 +44,6 @@ RIGHT (vertical):
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Planning
|
||||
|
||||
When exploring the codebase, use the project's domain glossary so that test names and interface vocabulary match the project's language, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.
|
||||
|
||||
Before writing any code:
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Confirm with user what interface changes are needed
|
||||
@@ -1,23 +1,21 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: to-issues
|
||||
description: Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable issues on the project issue tracker using tracer-bullet vertical slices. Use when user wants to convert a plan into issues, create implementation tickets, or break down work into issues.
|
||||
description: Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable GitHub issues using tracer-bullet vertical slices. Use when user wants to convert a plan into issues, create implementation tickets, or break down work into issues.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# To Issues
|
||||
|
||||
Break a plan into independently-grabbable issues using vertical slices (tracer bullets).
|
||||
|
||||
The issue tracker and triage label vocabulary should have been provided to you — run `/setup-matt-pocock-skills` if not.
|
||||
Break a plan into independently-grabbable GitHub issues using vertical slices (tracer bullets).
|
||||
|
||||
## Process
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Gather context
|
||||
|
||||
Work from whatever is already in the conversation context. If the user passes an issue reference (issue number, URL, or path) as an argument, fetch it from the issue tracker and read its full body and comments.
|
||||
Work from whatever is already in the conversation context. If the user passes a GitHub issue number or URL as an argument, fetch it with `gh issue view <number>` (with comments).
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Explore the codebase (optional)
|
||||
|
||||
If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current state of the code. Issue titles and descriptions should use the project's domain glossary vocabulary, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.
|
||||
If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current state of the code.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Draft vertical slices
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -49,16 +47,16 @@ Ask the user:
|
||||
|
||||
Iterate until the user approves the breakdown.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Publish the issues to the issue tracker
|
||||
### 5. Create the GitHub issues
|
||||
|
||||
For each approved slice, publish a new issue to the issue tracker. Use the issue body template below. Apply the `needs-triage` triage label so each issue enters the normal triage flow.
|
||||
For each approved slice, create a GitHub issue using `gh issue create`. Use the issue body template below.
|
||||
|
||||
Publish issues in dependency order (blockers first) so you can reference real issue identifiers in the "Blocked by" field.
|
||||
Create issues in dependency order (blockers first) so you can reference real issue numbers in the "Blocked by" field.
|
||||
|
||||
<issue-template>
|
||||
## Parent
|
||||
|
||||
A reference to the parent issue on the issue tracker (if the source was an existing issue, otherwise omit this section).
|
||||
#<parent-issue-number> (if the source was a GitHub issue, otherwise omit this section)
|
||||
|
||||
## What to build
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -72,7 +70,7 @@ A concise description of this vertical slice. Describe the end-to-end behavior,
|
||||
|
||||
## Blocked by
|
||||
|
||||
- A reference to the blocking ticket (if any)
|
||||
- Blocked by #<issue-number> (if any)
|
||||
|
||||
Or "None - can start immediately" if no blockers.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,15 +1,13 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: to-prd
|
||||
description: Turn the current conversation context into a PRD and publish it to the project issue tracker. Use when user wants to create a PRD from the current context.
|
||||
description: Turn the current conversation context into a PRD and submit it as a GitHub issue. Use when user wants to create a PRD from the current context.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
This skill takes the current conversation context and codebase understanding and produces a PRD. Do NOT interview the user — just synthesize what you already know.
|
||||
|
||||
The issue tracker and triage label vocabulary should have been provided to you — run `/setup-matt-pocock-skills` if not.
|
||||
|
||||
## Process
|
||||
|
||||
1. Explore the repo to understand the current state of the codebase, if you haven't already. Use the project's domain glossary vocabulary throughout the PRD, and respect any ADRs in the area you're touching.
|
||||
1. Explore the repo to understand the current state of the codebase, if you haven't already.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Sketch out the major modules you will need to build or modify to complete the implementation. Actively look for opportunities to extract deep modules that can be tested in isolation.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -17,7 +15,7 @@ A deep module (as opposed to a shallow module) is one which encapsulates a lot o
|
||||
|
||||
Check with the user that these modules match their expectations. Check with the user which modules they want tests written for.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Write the PRD using the template below, then publish it to the project issue tracker. Apply the `needs-triage` triage label so it enters the normal triage flow.
|
||||
3. Write the PRD using the template below and submit it as a GitHub issue.
|
||||
|
||||
<prd-template>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: triage-issue
|
||||
description: Triage a bug or issue by exploring the codebase to find root cause, then create a GitHub issue with a TDD-based fix plan. Use when user reports a bug, wants to file an issue, mentions "triage", or wants to investigate and plan a fix for a problem.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Triage Issue
|
||||
|
||||
Investigate a reported problem, find its root cause, and create a GitHub issue with a TDD fix plan. This is a mostly hands-off workflow - minimize questions to the user.
|
||||
|
||||
## Process
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Capture the problem
|
||||
|
||||
Get a brief description of the issue from the user. If they haven't provided one, ask ONE question: "What's the problem you're seeing?"
|
||||
|
||||
Do NOT ask follow-up questions yet. Start investigating immediately.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Explore and diagnose
|
||||
|
||||
Use the Agent tool with subagent_type=Explore to deeply investigate the codebase. Your goal is to find:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Where** the bug manifests (entry points, UI, API responses)
|
||||
- **What** code path is involved (trace the flow)
|
||||
- **Why** it fails (the root cause, not just the symptom)
|
||||
- **What** related code exists (similar patterns, tests, adjacent modules)
|
||||
|
||||
Look at:
|
||||
- Related source files and their dependencies
|
||||
- Existing tests (what's tested, what's missing)
|
||||
- Recent changes to affected files (`git log` on relevant files)
|
||||
- Error handling in the code path
|
||||
- Similar patterns elsewhere in the codebase that work correctly
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Identify the fix approach
|
||||
|
||||
Based on your investigation, determine:
|
||||
|
||||
- The minimal change needed to fix the root cause
|
||||
- Which modules/interfaces are affected
|
||||
- What behaviors need to be verified via tests
|
||||
- Whether this is a regression, missing feature, or design flaw
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Design TDD fix plan
|
||||
|
||||
Create a concrete, ordered list of RED-GREEN cycles. Each cycle is one vertical slice:
|
||||
|
||||
- **RED**: Describe a specific test that captures the broken/missing behavior
|
||||
- **GREEN**: Describe the minimal code change to make that test pass
|
||||
|
||||
Rules:
|
||||
- Tests verify behavior through public interfaces, not implementation details
|
||||
- One test at a time, vertical slices (NOT all tests first, then all code)
|
||||
- Each test should survive internal refactors
|
||||
- Include a final refactor step if needed
|
||||
- **Durability**: Only suggest fixes that would survive radical codebase changes. Describe behaviors and contracts, not internal structure. Tests assert on observable outcomes (API responses, UI state, user-visible effects), not internal state. A good suggestion reads like a spec; a bad one reads like a diff.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Create the GitHub issue
|
||||
|
||||
Create a GitHub issue using `gh issue create` with the template below. Do NOT ask the user to review before creating - just create it and share the URL.
|
||||
|
||||
<issue-template>
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
A clear description of the bug or issue, including:
|
||||
- What happens (actual behavior)
|
||||
- What should happen (expected behavior)
|
||||
- How to reproduce (if applicable)
|
||||
|
||||
## Root Cause Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
Describe what you found during investigation:
|
||||
- The code path involved
|
||||
- Why the current code fails
|
||||
- Any contributing factors
|
||||
|
||||
Do NOT include specific file paths, line numbers, or implementation details that couple to current code layout. Describe modules, behaviors, and contracts instead. The issue should remain useful even after major refactors.
|
||||
|
||||
## TDD Fix Plan
|
||||
|
||||
A numbered list of RED-GREEN cycles:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **RED**: Write a test that [describes expected behavior]
|
||||
**GREEN**: [Minimal change to make it pass]
|
||||
|
||||
2. **RED**: Write a test that [describes next behavior]
|
||||
**GREEN**: [Minimal change to make it pass]
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
**REFACTOR**: [Any cleanup needed after all tests pass]
|
||||
|
||||
## Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Criterion 1
|
||||
- [ ] Criterion 2
|
||||
- [ ] All new tests pass
|
||||
- [ ] Existing tests still pass
|
||||
|
||||
</issue-template>
|
||||
|
||||
After creating the issue, print the issue URL and a one-line summary of the root cause.
|
||||
@@ -4,4 +4,4 @@ description: Tell the agent to zoom out and give broader context or a higher-lev
|
||||
disable-model-invocation: true
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
I don't know this area of code well. Go up a layer of abstraction. Give me a map of all the relevant modules and callers, using the project's domain glossary vocabulary.
|
||||
I don't know this area of code well. Go up a layer of abstraction. Give me a map of all the relevant modules and callers.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user